Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Gleason Vs. Wood

Gleason vs Wood

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided May-13-1912
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/91263

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
224 U.S. 679
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Gleason

Respondent

Wood

Excerpt

gleason v. wood - 224 u.s. 679 (1912) u.s. supreme court gleason v. wood, 224 u.s. 679 (1912) gleason v. wood no. 575 argued february 23, 1912 decided may 13, 1912 224 u.s. 679 `error to the supreme court of the state of oklahoma syllabus decided on authority of choate v. trapp, ante, p. 224 u. s. 665 . 28 okl. 502 reversed. the facts, which involve the taxability of choctaw allotments in oklahoma, are stated in the opinion. mr. justice lamar delivered the opinion of the court. the complaint alleges that the plaintiffs are choctaws owning homesteads and surplus granted under the terms of the atoka agreement. their applications to enjoin the officers of the state of oklahoma from assessing their lands for taxation for the year 1909 were denied. all of the page 224 u. s. 680 questions involved are disposed of by the decision in choate v. trapp, ante, p. 224 u. s. 665 . the judgment therefore is reversed, and the case remanded, with directions for further proceedings not inconsistent with that opinion. reversed.

Full Judgment

Gleason v. Wood - 224 U.S. 679 (1912)
U.S. Supreme Court Gleason v. Wood, 224 U.S. 679 (1912)

Gleason v. Wood

No. 575

Argued February 23, 1912

Decided May 13, 1912

224 U.S. 679

`ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT

OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA

SYLLABUS

Decided on authority of Choate v. Trapp, ante, p. 224 U. S. 665 .

28 Okl. 502 reversed.

The facts, which involve the taxability of Choctaw allotments in Oklahoma, are stated in the opinion.

MR. JUSTICE LAMAR delivered the opinion of the Court.

The complaint alleges that the plaintiffs are Choctaws owning homesteads and surplus granted under the terms of the Atoka Agreement. Their applications to enjoin the officers of the State of Oklahoma from assessing their lands for taxation for the year 1909 were denied. All of the

Page 224 U. S. 680

questions involved are disposed of by the decision in Choate v. Trapp, ante, p. 224 U. S. 665 . The judgment therefore is reversed, and the case remanded, with directions for further proceedings not inconsistent with that opinion.

Reversed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial