Citation network
Rogers Vs. HennepIn County
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Feb 21, 1916
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Rogers v. HennepinSearch
-
County - 240 U.S. 184 (1916) U.S. Supreme Court Rogers v. HennepinSearch
-
County, 240 U.S. 184 (1916) Rogers v. HennepinSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
jurisdiction of the taxing officers. Another appeal was then pending in the same court in the case of State v. McPhailSearch
-
State v. McPhailSearch
-
The case was submitted on briefs in this Court with State v. McPhailSearch
-
court rests upon an independent or nonfederal ground adequate to support it, this Court has no jurisdiction. Hammond v. JohnstonSearch
-
Gaar, Scott & Co. v. ShannonSearch
-
other conclusion can be drawn from the fact that the sole reason for the decision is found in the reference to State v. McPhailSearch
-
jurisdiction to review the judgment, assuming it to be a final judgment, as it is here. Hancock National Bank v. FarnumSearch
-
San Jose Land Co. v. SanSearch
-
Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry. v. SowersSearch
-
Carlson v. WashingtonSearch
-
allegations of the complaint -- that the memberships, despite the restrictions of the rules, were property. See Hyde v. WoodsSearch
-
the operation of the statute, as thus defined, it overrides the federal right which is claimed. Clement National Bank v. VermontSearch
-
is called double taxation. The membership, as property, was distinct from the assets of the corporation. Van Allen v. AssessorsSearch
-
Davidson v. NewSearch
-
U. S. 134 , 161 U. S. 146 , and see St. Louis Southwestern Ry. v. ArkansasSearch
-
for the hearing of grievances where the estimate is regarded by the members as excessive. Brooklyn City R. Co. v. NewSearch
-
Orient Ins. Co. v. BoardSearch
-
they were held by residents or nonresidents at the place within the state where the exchange was located. Tappan v. MerchantsSearch
-
State Board v. ComptoirSearch
-
Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. NewSearch
-
Liverpool Ins. Co. v. OrleansSearch
-
Hawley v. MaldenSearch
-
The state has a broad discretion as to tax exemptions ( Bell's Gap R. Co. v. PennsylvaniaSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Rogers v. HennepinSearch
-
of State v. McPhailSearch
-
See Hyde v. WoodsSearch
-
Van Allen v. AssessorsSearch
-
St. Louis Southwestern Ry. v. ArkansasSearch
-
Brooklyn City R. Co. v. NewSearch
-
Tappan v. MerchantsSearch
-
Bank of Commerce v. TennesseeSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial