Citation network
Missouri Vs. Illinois and Sanitary District of Chicago
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 28, 1901
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Missouri v. IllinoisSearch
-
Sanitary District of Chicago - 180 U.S. 208 (1901) U.S. Supreme Court Missouri v. IllinoisSearch
-
Sanitary District of Chicago, 180 U.S. 208 (1901) Missouri v. IllinoisSearch
-
Rev.Stat. sec. 687. The case of New York v. ConnecticutSearch
-
it possessed jurisdiction, although, under the facts of the case, it refused the injunction prayed for. New Jersey v. NewSearch
-
to questions in which the sovereign and political powers of the respective states were in controversy. In Florida v. GeorgiaSearch
-
of the existence of the jurisdiction of the Court over the controversy between the two states. Pennsylvania v. WheelingSearch
-
Same v. SameSearch
-
the obstruction be removed either by elevating the bridge to a height designated or by abatement. South Carolina v. GeorgiaSearch
-
and accordingly the special injunction previously granted was dissolved and the bill dismissed. Wisconsin v. DuluthSearch
-
into the facts put in issue by the bill and answer and by dismissing the bill for want of equity. In Virginia v. WestSearch
-
And, after citing Rhode Island v. MassachusettsSearch
-
Florida v. GeorgiaSearch
-
How. 478, and Alabama v. GeorgiaSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
In New Hampshire v. LouisianaSearch
-
and New York v. LouisianaSearch
-
In Wisconsin v. PelicanSearch
-
judgment was entered for the defendant on the demurrer that had been interposed to the declaration. Hans v. LouisianaSearch
-
between states as to boundary lines and other questions admitting of judicial solution. And yet the case of Penn v. LordSearch
-
public law, are not subjects of judicial cognizance, this Court has often declined to take jurisdiction. See Wisconsin v. PelicanSearch
-
The last case which we have had occasion to examine is that of Louisiana v. TexasSearch
-
of its citizens, the jurisdiction of this Court would attach. Chief Justice Marshall, in the case of Cohen v. VirginiaSearch
-
that, upon further consideration, in cases arising under different states of facts, the general language used in Cohen v. VirginiaSearch
-
has been to some extent modified. Thus, in the cases of New Hampshire v. LouisianaSearch
-
and testimony, the states complainant had no interest of any kind in the proceedings. So, too, in Wisconsin v. PelicanSearch
-
penal laws of one state against a citizen of another, to refuse to exercise jurisdiction. In the case of Louisiana v. TexasSearch
-
It is state action and its results that are complained of, thus distinguishing this case from that of Louisiana v. TexasSearch
-
of this part of the defendants' contention, but think it sufficient to cite one or two authorities. Attorney General v. JamaicaSearch
-
in the case of public nuisances was well described by MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, speaking for the Court in the case of Mugler v. KansasSearch
-
In Coosaw Mining Co. v. SouthSearch
-
the suggestion that the complainants' remedy has been lost by delay is not founded in fact or reason. In Goldsmid v. TunbridgeSearch
-
apprehend that the observations which were quoted to me of Vice Chancellor Sir William Page Wood, in Attorney General v. MayorSearch
-
of the Master of the Rolls was subsequently affirmed on appeal. L.R. 1 Ch. 349. Similar views prevailed in Chapman v. RochesterSearch
-
his lands. In the opinion of the New York Court of Appeals, it was said by Danforth, J., after citing Goldsmid v. TunbridgeSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Missouri v. IllinoisSearch
-
of New York v. ConnecticutSearch
-
New Jersey v. NewSearch
-
In Florida v. GeorgiaSearch
-
Pennsylvania v. WheelingSearch
-
Wisconsin v. DuluthSearch
-
In Virginia v. WestSearch
-
and Alabama v. GeorgiaSearch
-
Hans v. LouisianaSearch
-
of Penn v. LordSearch
-
See Wisconsin v. PelicanSearch
-
of Louisiana v. TexasSearch
-
of Cohen v. VirginiaSearch
-
Cohen v. VirginiaSearch
-
of New Hampshire v. LouisianaSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial