Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

United States Vs. King

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Mar 08, 1893

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

33 entries 5 linked 28 unlinked
Show
  1. United States Vs. Ripley US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1832
  2. United States Vs. Fillebrown US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1832
  3. United States Vs. Mcdaniel US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1832
  4. United States Vs. Brindle US Supreme Court · Mar 03, 1884
  5. United States Vs. Shoemaker US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1868
  6. U.S. 676 (1893) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. King
    Search
  7. U.S. 676 (1893) United States v. King
    Search
  8. and costs. See Erwin v. United
    Search
  9. under orders of the head of a department, though there were no act of Congress providing for the case. United States v. McDaniel
    Search
  10. Pet. 28. See also Gratiot v. United
    Search
  11. Of this statute it was said by this Court in Hoyt v. United
    Search
  12. This language was somewhat limited by Chief Justice Taney in Converse v. United
    Search
  13. for lighthouses outside of his district and beyond the limits to which his duties extended. See also United States v. Brindle
    Search
  14. U. S. 688 . Further construing this statute, it was held in United States v. Shoemaker
    Search
  15. disbursements made for building a customhouse and marine hospital at the port where he was collector. See also Hall v. United
    Search
  16. States, 91 U. S. 559 , wherein items for setoff for extra services and expenses were excluded, and Badeau v. United
    Search
  17. in the consular service was held to be precluded from receiving salary as an officer in the army. In United States v. Saunders
    Search
  18. entering orders approving the accounts of marshals and other officers, are allowed upon the authority of United States v. Jones
    Search
  19. of fees due by the United States to witnesses and jurors is stated by the court below to be as follows, ( Erwin v. United
    Search
  20. While we held in the case of United States v. Van
    Search
  21. The proceedings before a commissioner are principally for the information of the district attorney. In United States v. Van
    Search
  22. U.S. Supreme Court United States v. King
    Search
  23. See Erwin v. United
    Search
  24. Gratiot v. United
    Search
  25. Hoyt v. United
    Search
  26. Converse v. United
    Search
  27. Hall v. United
    Search
  28. and Badeau v. United
    Search
  29. In United States v. Saunders
    Search
  30. of United States v. Jones
    Search
  31. Erwin v. United
    Search
  32. of United States v. Van
    Search
  33. In United States v. Van
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial