Citation network
Gibson Vs. Shufeldt
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 23, 1887
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 27 (1887) U.S. Supreme Court Gibson v. ShufeldtSearch
-
U.S. 27 (1887) Gibson v. ShufeldtSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
without regard to the collateral effect of the judgment in another suit between the same or other parties. Elgin v. MarshallSearch
-
Opelika v. DanielSearch
-
Railroad Co. v. KnoxSearch
-
Bradstreet Co. v. HigginsSearch
-
Bruce v. ManchesterSearch
-
for rent, the amount for which avowry is made is the real matter in dispute and the limit of jurisdiction. Peyton v. RobertsonSearch
-
appeal was taken by the creditor and in the other by a mortgagee of the property. In Farmers' Bank of Alexandria v. HooffSearch
-
In Ross v. PrentissSearch
-
the parties is that which is asserted on the one side and denied on the other. In the leading case of Oliver v. AlexanderSearch
-
Upon like reasons, in Rich v. LambertSearch
-
on the property of each owner is within it, no appeal lies, either by the salvors or by the owners. Stratton v. JarvisSearch
-
of the fund thus created among those having claims against it. To the same class may perhaps be assigned Rodd v. HearttSearch
-
among them, the whole sum sued for is the test of the jurisdiction. The earliest case of that class is Shields v. ThomasSearch
-
and apportioning it among them in shares less than that sum. The case was distinguished from those of Oliver v. AlexanderSearch
-
and Rich v. LambertSearch
-
To the same class belongs Freeman v. DawsonSearch
-
took jurisdiction of an appeal by the trustee from a decree in favor of the judgment creditor. In Market Co. v. HoffmanSearch
-
alone are in dispute, the amount of the interest of each is the limit of the appellate jurisdiction. In Seaver v. BigelowsSearch
-
But the opinion, as appears by the reasoning above quoted, and by the reference in it to Oliver v. AlexanderSearch
-
above cited, was evidently framed to cover two other cases, argued and decided contemporaneously with Seaver v. BigelowsSearch
-
Similar decree made for the same reason in the case of Field v. BigelowSearch
-
and in one branch of Myers v. FennSearch
-
In Field v. BigelowSearch
-
creditor therefore is entitled to an appeal to this Court within the statute, as decided in the case of Seaver v. BigelowsSearch
-
In Myers v. FennSearch
-
the appeal was dismissed on the authority of Seaver v. BigelowsSearch
-
Page 122 U. S. 36 So, in Russell v. StansellSearch
-
Chatfield v. BoyleSearch
-
In Schwed v. SmithSearch
-
It is impossible to distinguish this case in principle from Seaver v. BigelowsSearch
-
Page 122 U. S. 37 In Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. WatermanSearch
-
and the appeal was dismissed as to those petitioners whose debts were severally less than that sum. And in Hassall. v. WilcoxSearch
-
in a railroad mortgage from a decree in favor of several creditors claiming prior liens. In Fourth National Bank v. StoutSearch
-
In Stewart v. DunhamSearch
-
is alleged or found to be liable is less than the jurisdictional amount. For instance it was decided in Paving Co. v. MulfordSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial