Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Friend Vs. Wise

Friend vs Wise

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided May-05-1884
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/84762

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
111 U.S. 797
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Friend

Respondent

Wise

Excerpt

friend v. wise - 111 u.s. 797 (1884) u.s. supreme court friend v. wise, 111 u.s. 797 (1884) friend v. wise submitted april 21, 1884 decided may 5, 1884 111 u.s. 797 i n error to the circuit court of the united states for the district of california syllabus in ejectment in which several defendants are joined who hold separate tracts adversely to the plaintiff, this court will not dismiss the writ of error because each separate tract is not of the jurisdictional value if their combined values are sufficient to give jurisdiction. motion to dismiss, with which a motion to affirm was united. mr. justice waite delivered the opinion of the court. page 111 u. s. 798 these motions are denied. the value of the two sections of land which are in dispute is conceded to be more than $5,000. the complaint alleges a joint entry and ouster, and answer does not set up separate claims to distinct parcels of the land by the several defendants. the judgment for the recovery of the possession is against all the defendants jointly. in this respect, the case is entirely different from those of tupper v. wise and lynch v. bailey, 110 u. s. 398 . we have jurisdiction therefore. the questions arising on the merits are, some of them, of a character that ought not to be disposed of on a motion to affirm.

Full Judgment

Friend v. Wise - 111 U.S. 797 (1884)
U.S. Supreme Court Friend v. Wise, 111 U.S. 797 (1884)

Friend v. Wise

Submitted April 21, 1884

Decided May 5, 1884

111 U.S. 797

I N ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED

STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SYLLABUS

In ejectment in which several defendants are joined who hold separate tracts adversely to the plaintiff, this Court will not dismiss the writ of error because each separate tract is not of the jurisdictional value if their combined values are sufficient to give jurisdiction.

Motion to dismiss, with which a motion to affirm was united.

MR. JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court.

Page 111 U. S. 798

These motions are denied. The value of the two sections of land which are in dispute is conceded to be more than $5,000. The complaint alleges a joint entry and ouster, and answer does not set up separate claims to distinct parcels of the land by the several defendants. The judgment for the recovery of the possession is against all the defendants jointly. In this respect, the case is entirely different from those of Tupper v. Wise and Lynch v. Bailey, 110 U. S. 398 . We have jurisdiction therefore.

The questions arising on the merits are, some of them, of a character that ought not to be disposed of on a motion to affirm.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial