Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Farrington Vs. Tennessee

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jan 01, 1877

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

70 entries 8 linked 62 unlinked
Show
  1. Tucker Vs. Ferguson US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1874
  2. Curran Vs. Arkansas US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1853
  3. People Vs. Commissioners US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1881
  4. Wilmington Railroad Vs. Reid US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1871
  5. Dodge Vs. Woolsey US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1885
  6. Trist Vs. Child US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1874
  7. New Jersey Vs. Yard US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1877
  8. Providence Bank Vs. Billings US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1830
  9. U.S. 679 (1877) U.S. Supreme Court Farrington v. Tennessee
    Search
  10. U.S. 679 (1877) Farrington v. Tennessee
    Search
  11. impaired, all is in peril. It is needless to lift the veil and contemplate the future of such a people. Trist v. Child
    Search
  12. requires no consideration to support it. A gift consummated is as valid in law as anything else. Dartmouth College v. Woodward
    Search
  13. is to be done or not to be done by one or both the parties. Only a slight consideration is necessary. Pillans v. Van
    Search
  14. Forth v. Stanton
    Search
  15. into activity the constitutional provision and the judicial power of this Court to redress the wrong. Von Hoffman v. City
    Search
  16. Dash v. Van
    Search
  17. Kleeck, 7 Johns. (N.Y.) 477. See also Society v. Wheeler
    Search
  18. body to which it belonged. To the extent of such assent, amendments were effectual, and no further. Dartmouth College v. Woodward
    Search
  19. The King v. Passmore
    Search
  20. of the Roman emperors, sometimes applied in molding and administering the civil law in special cases. In The King v. Passmore
    Search
  21. and none has been asked for. The same doctrine has been often reaffirmed in later cases. The last one is New Jersey v. Yard
    Search
  22. law is as much a part of the law of every state as its own local laws and Constitution. Farmers' & Mechanics' Bank v. Deering
    Search
  23. explicit to admit fairly of any other construction that the proposition can be supported. West Wisconsin Railway Co. v. Board
    Search
  24. If the corporation be dissolved by judgment of law, equity may interpose and perform the same functions. Wood v. Dummer
    Search
  25. Gordon v. Appeal
    Search
  26. Van Allen v. Assessors
    Search
  27. Queen v. Arnaud
    Search
  28. Union Bank v. State
    Search
  29. Van Allen v. The
    Search
  30. State v. Branin
    Search
  31. M'Culloch v. Maryland
    Search
  32. Hamilton v. Massachusetts
    Search
  33. Wall. 264. 2. Accumulated earnings. State v. Utter
    Search
  34. St. Louis Mutual Insurance Co. v. Charles
    Search
  35. Mo. 462. 3. Profits and dividends. Attorney-General v. Bank
    Search
  36. estate belonging to the corporation and necessary Page 95 U. S. 688 for its business. Wilmington Railroad v. Reid
    Search
  37. Bank of Cape Fear v. Edwards
    Search
  38. where there is no protection by previous compact. Unrestrained power to tax is power to destroy. M'Culloch v. Maryland
    Search
  39. the state might have been silent as to taxation. In that case, the power would have been unfettered. Providence Bank v. Billings
    Search
  40. authority conferred by a later act of the legislature authorizing a bridge to be so built. In Wilmington Railroad v. Reid
    Search
  41. of the company. This Court held the exemption to be a contract, and adjudged the laws to be void. Union Bank v. State
    Search
  42. than upon the capital stock in the other. The same negative considerations apply to both. In Bank of Cape Fear v. Edwards
    Search
  43. tax, state or county, and that the banking house and the lot upon which it stood was within the exemption. Gordon v. Appeal
    Search
  44. is unnecessary. The points of analogy are too obvious and cogent to require remark. See also State Bank of Ohio v. Knoop
    Search
  45. and Home of the Friendless v. Rouse
    Search
  46. directions to enter a decree in favor of the plaintiff in error, and it is So ordered. NOTE -- In Dunscomb v. Tennessee
    Search
  47. Wicks v. Same
    Search
  48. Neely v. Same
    Search
  49. Supreme Court of the State of Tennessee, which were argued by the same counsel as was the preceding case, and in Hill v. Tennessee
    Search
  50. These cases are all disposed of by the opinion in Farrington v. Tennessee
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial