Citation network
Pierce County Vs. Guillen
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Nov 04, 2002
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 129 (2002) October Term, 2002 Syllabus Pierce County, Washington V. GuillenSearch
-
jurisdictional purposes even though further proceedings are to take place in the state courts. Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. CohnSearch
-
must be construed narrowly because they impede the search for the truth. See Baldrige v. ShapiroSearch
-
compiled in connection with the Program. See Brief for United States as Amicus Curiae in Alabama Highway Dept. v. BooneSearch
-
g., Ex parte Alabama Highway Dept., 572 So. 2d 389 (Ala. 1990), cert. denied sub nom. Alabama Highway Dept. v. BooneSearch
-
Light v. NewSearch
-
Indiana Dept. of Transp. v. OvertonSearch
-
funding application remained both admissible and discoverable. See, e. g., Wiedeman v. DixieSearch
-
So. 2d 170, 173 (La. 1993), cert. denied, 511 U. S. 1127 (1994). See also, e. g., Southern Pacific Transp. Co. v. YarnellSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Tardy v. NorfolkSearch
-
of the regulation of the federal-aid highway system and, thus, could not be upheld under Hodel v. IndianaSearch
-
Jefferson v. CitySearch
-
of Tarrant, 522 U. S. 75 , 81 (1997) (quoting Market Street R. Co. v. RailroadSearch
-
P. 3d, at 655-656. 141 proceedings are to take place in the state courts. Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. CohnSearch
-
U. S. 469 , 477-483 (1975) (outlining four exceptions to the finality rule). See also, e. g., ASARCO Inc. v. KadishSearch
-
did not determine the final outcome of the litigation. Nor do any of the exceptions outlined in Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. CohnSearch
-
B intersection were not negligent. Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. CohnSearch
-
we would still be able to review the discovery issue once a final judgment has been entered. Jef ferson v. CitySearch
-
Overlake Fund v. BellevueSearch
-
see also Tacoma News, Inc. v. Tacoma-PierceSearch
-
evidentiary privileges must be construed narrowly because privileges impede the search for the truth. Baldrige v. Sha-Search
-
quoting St. Regis Paper Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 368 U. S. 208 , 218 (1961)). See also, e. g., University of Pennsylvania v. EEOCSearch
-
U. S. 182 , 189 (1990). See generally United States v. NixonSearch
-
not intended to be an effort-free tool in litigation against state and local governments. Compare, e. g., Robertson v. UnionSearch
-
quoting Light v. NewSearch
-
U. S. 549 , 558 147 (1995) (citing United States v. DarbySearch
-
Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. UnitedSearch
-
Southern R. Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Perez v. UnitedSearch
-
the first instance issues not resolved below and decline to do so here. See, e. g., National Collegiate Athletic Assn. v. SmithSearch
-
Syllabus Pierce County, Washington V. GuillenSearch
-
See Baldrige v. ShapiroSearch
-
Alabama Highway Dept. v. BooneSearch
-
Wiedeman v. DixieSearch
-
Southern Pacific Transp. Co. v. YarnellSearch
-
Market Street R. Co. v. RailroadSearch
-
ASARCO Inc. v. KadishSearch
-
Tacoma News, Inc. v. Tacoma-PierceSearch
-
Baldrige v. Sha-Search
-
St. Regis Paper Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
University of Pennsylvania v. EEOCSearch
-
Robertson v. UnionSearch
-
United States v. NixonSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial