Citation network
Hathorn Vs. Lovorn
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 15, 1982
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 255 (1982) U.S. Supreme Court Hathorn v. LovornSearch
-
U.S. 255 (1982) Hathorn v. LovornSearch
-
each supervisors district must elect one trustee. Lovorn v. HathornSearch
-
Supreme Court denied the petition without comment, and this Court denied a petition for a writ of certiorari. Hathorn v. LovornSearch
-
Carter v. LukeSearch
-
U. S. 85 , 350 U. S. 87 (1955). See also Davis v. O'HaraSearch
-
United Page 457 U. S. 262 States v. DenverSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Barr v. CitySearch
-
New & Hughes Drilling Co. v. SmithSearch
-
Rigdon v. GeneralSearch
-
that the court does not consistently preclude consideration of issues raised for the first time on rehearing. In Quinn v. BranninSearch
-
last Term, we summarized the principles governing state court jurisdiction to decide federal issues. Gulf Offshore Co. v. MobilSearch
-
procedure. Other courts may decide the distinct question of whether a proposed change is subject to the Act. See Allen v. StateSearch
-
Allen v. StateSearch
-
U. S. 465 , 428 U. S. 494 , n. 35 (1976) (citing Martin v. Hunter'sSearch
-
to follow either of these routes renders the change unenforceable. See, e.g., Dougherty County Board of Education v. WhiteSearch
-
United States v. BoardSearch
-
Court entertaining that suit should address the problem of relief in the first instance. As we noted in Perkins v. MatthewsSearch
-
seek a declaratory judgment in the first instance, omitting submission to the Attorney General. See generally Blanding v. DuBoseSearch
-
Market Street R. Co. v. RailroadSearch
-
Hughes Tool Co. v. TransSearch
-
E.g., Michigan v. TylerSearch
-
have found that might have actually applied the procedural rule described by respondents. See Leake County Cooperative v. DependentsSearch
-
Cortez v. BrownSearch
-
Cash v. IllinoisSearch
-
McKee v. McKeeSearch
-
City of Jackson v. CapitalSearch
-
Realty Title Guaranty Co. v. HowardSearch
-
Couch v. MartinezSearch
-
Foster v. FosterSearch
-
McCrory v. StateSearch
-
Daniels v. StateSearch
-
Mississippi State Highway Comm'n v. GreshamSearch
-
Powers v. MalleySearch
-
So.2d 262, 264 (1974). In Mississippi State Highway Comm'n v. GreshamSearch
-
on rehearing suggests that it was raised for the first time by the party petitioning for that relief. E.g., Cortez v. BrownSearch
-
Mississippi plainly is one of the jurisdictions covered by the statute. South Carolina v. KatzenbachSearch
-
s strictures. See Dougherty County Board of Education v. WhiteSearch
-
even if a judicial decree constrains those choices. McDaniel v. SanchezSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Hathorn v. LovornSearch
-
Lovorn v. HathornSearch
-
Davis v. O'HaraSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial