Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

O'Dell Vs. Espinoza

O'Dell vs Espinoza

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided May-03-1982
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/105254

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
456 U.S. 430
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

O'Dell

Respondent

Espinoza

Excerpt

o'dell v. espinoza - 456 u.s. 430 (1982) u.s. supreme court o'dell v. espinoza, 456 u.s. 430 (1982) o'dell v. espinoza no. 81-534 argued april 26, 1983 decided may 3, 1982 456 u.s. 430 certiorari to the supreme court of colorado certiorari dismissed for want of jurisdiction. reported below: 633 p.2d 455. per curiam. under 28 u.s.c. § 1257, this court has jurisdiction to review only "[f]inal judgments or decrees rendered by the highest court of a state in which a decision could be had." because the colorado supreme court remanded this case for trial, its decision is not final "as an effective determination of the litigation." market street r. co. v. railroad comm'n of cal., 324 u. s. 548 , 324 u. s. 551 (1945). although there is a limited set of situations in which we have found finality as to the federal issue despite the ordering of further proceedings in the lower state courts, see cox broadcasting corp. v. cohn, 420 u. s. 469 (1975), this case does not fit into any of those categories. we therefore dismiss for want of jurisdiction. it is so ordered.

Full Judgment

O'Dell v. Espinoza - 456 U.S. 430 (1982)
U.S. Supreme Court O'Dell v. Espinoza, 456 U.S. 430 (1982)

O'Dell v. Espinoza

No. 81-534

Argued April 26, 1983

Decided May 3, 1982

456 U.S. 430

CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO

Certiorari dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Reported below: 633 P.2d 455.

PER CURIAM.

Under 28 U.S.C. § 1257, this Court has jurisdiction to review only "[f]inal judgments or decrees rendered by the highest court of a State in which a decision could be had." Because the Colorado Supreme Court remanded this case for trial, its decision is not final "as an effective determination of the litigation." Market Street R. Co. v. Railroad Comm'n of Cal., 324 U. S. 548 , 324 U. S. 551 (1945). Although there is a limited set of situations in which we have found finality as to the federal issue despite the ordering of further proceedings in the lower state courts, see Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. Cohn, 420 U. S. 469 (1975), this case does not fit into any of those categories. We therefore dismiss for want of jurisdiction.

It is so ordered.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial