Citation network
Hodel Vs. Indiana
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 15, 1981
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 314 (1981) U.S. Supreme Court Hodel v. IndianaSearch
-
U.S. 314 (1981) Hodel v. IndianaSearch
-
Page 452 U. S. 317 JUSTICE MARSHALL delivered the opinion of the Court. This appeal, like Hodel v. VirginiaSearch
-
and permanently enjoined their enforcement. 501 F.Supp. 452 (1980). We noted probable jurisdiction sub nom. Andrus v. IndianaSearch
-
and we now reverse. I A The basic structure of the Surface Mining Act is described in Hodel v. VirginiaSearch
-
Usery v. TurnerSearch
-
Elkhorn Mining Co., 428 U. S. 1 , 428 U. S. 15 (1976). See also Duke Power Co. v. CarolinaSearch
-
or that there is no reasonable connection between the regulatory means selected and the asserted ends. Hodel v. VirginiaSearch
-
Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. UnitedSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
rational basis test is the volume of commerce actually affected by the regulated activity. T his Court held in NLRB v. FainblattSearch
-
rationally conclude that the regulated activity affects interstate commerce. See Page 452 U. S. 325 Hodel v. VirginiaSearch
-
Perez v. UnitedSearch
-
U. S. 111 , 317 U. S. 127 -129 (1942). Cf. Polish National Alliance v. NLRBSearch
-
coal mining on prime farmland affects interstate commerce in agricultural products. As we explained in Stafford v. WallaceSearch
-
court incorrectly assumed that the Act's goals are limited to preventing air and water pollution. As we noted in Hodel v. VirginiaSearch
-
H.R.Rep. No. 95-218, supra, at 57-60. Moreover, as noted in Hodel v. VirginiaSearch
-
Surface Mining, relied for its Tenth Amendment analysis on this Court's decision in National League of Cities v. UserySearch
-
U. S. 833 (1976). For the reasons stated in our opinion in Hodel v. VirginiaSearch
-
prime farmland and few or no steep slope or mountaintop mining operations. Relying on this Court's decision in Hampton v. MowSearch
-
protection attack when the legislative means are rationally related to a legitimate governmental purpose. Schweiker v. WilsonSearch
-
United States Railroad Retirement Board v. FritzSearch
-
U. S. 332 that can only be overcome by a clear showing of arbitrariness and irrationality. Duke Power Co. v. CarolinaSearch
-
Elkhorn Mining Co., 428 U.S. at 428 U. S. 15 . As the Court explained in Vance v. BradleySearch
-
A claim of arbitrariness cannot rest solely on a statute's lack of uniform geographic impact. Secretary of Agriculture v. CentralSearch
-
on the wisdom of congressional policy determinations. In so doing, the court exceeded its proper role. See New Orleans v. DukesSearch
-
Page 452 U. S. 335 an unconstitutional taking of private property. For the reasons discussed more fully in Hodel v. VirginiaSearch
-
requirement applicable generally to surface mining operations. Appellees in Hodel v. VirginiaSearch
-
of the Act and the Secretary's response to those submissions is described in Hodel v. VirginiaSearch
-
and that the regulatory scheme, when considered as a whole, satisfies this test. See Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. UnitedSearch
-
U. S. 294 , 379 U. S. 303 -304 (1964). Cf. Perez v. UnitedSearch
-
Id. at 460. However, in Hodel v. VirginiaSearch
-
In these circumstances, there is no justiciable case or controversy concerning these sections of the Act. See Hodel v. VirginiaSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Hodel v. IndianaSearch
-
Hodel v. VirginiaSearch
-
Andrus v. IndianaSearch
-
Duke Power Co. v. CarolinaSearch
-
NLRB v. FainblattSearch
-
Cf. Polish National Alliance v. NLRBSearch
-
Hampton v. MowSearch
-
Schweiker v. WilsonSearch
-
Secretary of Agriculture v. CentralSearch
-
See New Orleans v. DukesSearch
-
See Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. UnitedSearch
-
Cf. Perez v. UnitedSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial