Citation network
Hodel Vs. Virginia Surface Mining
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 15, 1981
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Hodel v. VirginiaSearch
-
Surface Mining - 452 U.S. 264 (1981) U.S. Supreme Court Hodel v. VirginiaSearch
-
Surface Mining, 452 U.S. 264 (1981) Hodel v. VirginiaSearch
-
Cf. National League of Cities v. UserySearch
-
Id. at 435, quoting National League of Cities v. UserySearch
-
activity affects interstate commerce, if there is any rational basis for such a finding. Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. UnitedSearch
-
Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. UnitedSearch
-
States, supra, at 379 U. S. 262 . See United States v. DarbySearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
all by the fact that the Commerce Clause is a grant of plenary authority to Congress. See National League of Cities v. UserySearch
-
Cleveland v. UnitedSearch
-
NLRB v. JonesSearch
-
Perez v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 402 U. S. 146 , 402 U. S. 150 (1971). As we explained in Fry v. UnitedSearch
-
See National League of Cities v. UserySearch
-
United States v. WrightwoodSearch
-
Dairy Co., 315 U.S. at 315 U. S. 119 . See Fry v. UnitedSearch
-
activity of producing these goods itself affects interstate commerce. See, e.g., United States v. DarbySearch
-
U. S. 517 (1942). Cf. Katzenbach v. McClungSearch
-
interstate competition is a traditional role for congressional action under the Commerce Clause. In United States v. DarbySearch
-
The District Court's ruling relied heavily on our decision in National League of Cities v. UserySearch
-
must be reasonably adapted to the end permitted by the Constitution.' Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. UnitedSearch
-
processes of the States by directly compelling them to enact and enforce a federal regulatory program. Cf. Maryland v. EPASearch
-
F.2d 215, 224-228 (CA4 1975), vacated and remanded sub nom. EPA v. BrownSearch
-
District of Columbia v. TrainSearch
-
U.S.App.D.C. 311, 330-334, 521 F.2d 971, 990-994 (1975), vacated and remanded sub nom. EPA v. BrownSearch
-
Brown v. EPASearch
-
regulating private activity affecting interstate commerce when these laws conflict with federal law. See, e.g., Jones v. RathSearch
-
Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSearch
-
Bethlehem Steel Co. v. NewSearch
-
to prohibit all -- and not just inconsistent -- state regulation of such activities. See, e.g., City of Burbank v. LockheedSearch
-
Rice v. SantaSearch
-
Transit Comm'n v. UnitedSearch
-
States may consider important, the Supremacy Clause permits no other result. See Chicago & North Western Transp. Co. v. KaloSearch
-
Sanitary District v. UnitedSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Hodel v. VirginiaSearch
-
See United States v. DarbySearch
-
Congress. See National League of Cities v. UserySearch
-
Fry v. UnitedSearch
-
See Fry v. UnitedSearch
-
Cf. Katzenbach v. McClungSearch
-
the Commerce Clause. In United States v. DarbySearch
-
the Constitution.' Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. UnitedSearch
-
Cf. Maryland v. EPASearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial