Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Beal Vs. Doe

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jun 20, 1977

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

65 entries 10 linked 55 unlinked
Show
  1. Doe Vs. Bolton US Supreme Court · Jan 22, 1973
  2. Roe Vs. Wade US Supreme Court · Jan 22, 1973
  3. Roe Vs. Norton US Supreme Court · Jun 24, 1975
  4. Singleton Vs. Wulff US Supreme Court · Mar 23, 1976
  5. United States Vs. Vuitch US Supreme Court · Apr 21, 1971
  6. Eisenstadt Vs. Baird US Supreme Court · Mar 22, 1972
  7. Maher Vs. Roe US Supreme Court · Jun 20, 1977
  8. Massachusetts Bd. of Retirement Vs. Murgia US Supreme Court · Jun 25, 1976
  9. GersteIn Vs. Coe US Supreme Court · Jun 03, 1974
  10. Townsend Vs. Swank US Supreme Court · Dec 20, 1971
  11. U.S. 438 (1977) U.S. Supreme Court Beal v. Doe
    Search
  12. U.S. 438 (1977) Beal v. Doe
    Search
  13. Court held that Pennsylvania's medical necessity restriction denied respondents equal protection of the laws. Doe v. Wohlgemuth
    Search
  14. Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor
    Search
  15. of nontherapeutic abortions from Medicaid coverage is unreasonable under Title XIX. As we acknowledged in Roe v. Wade
    Search
  16. New York Dept. of Soc. Services v. Dublino
    Search
  17. U. S. 405 , 413 U. S. 421 (1973), quoting Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. FCC
    Search
  18. Brief for Petitioners 4, citing 3 Pennsylvania Bulletin 2207, 2209 (Sept. 29, 1973). In Doe v. Bolton
    Search
  19. F.Supp. at 191. In Maher v. Roe
    Search
  20. of the District Court's denial of injunctive relief, the Court of Appeals had jurisdiction over the appeals. Gerstein v. Coe
    Search
  21. that the federal statute does not require participating States to fund the cost of nontherapeutic abortions. Roe v. Norton
    Search
  22. Roe v. Ferguson
    Search
  23. F.2d 279 (CA6 1975). See also, e.g., Doe v. Westby
    Search
  24. Doe v. Stewart
    Search
  25. Our dissenting Brothers, in this case and in Maher v. Roe
    Search
  26. et seq. (1970 ed. and Supp. V), is read not to require funding of elective abortions. Maher v. Roe
    Search
  27. Ashwander v. TVA
    Search
  28. Westby v. Doe
    Search
  29. participants in the Medicaid program. Pregnancy is unquestionably a condition requiring medical services. See Roe v. Norton
    Search
  30. Klein v. Nassau
    Search
  31. County Medical Center, 347 F.Supp. 496, 500 (EDNY 1972), vacated for further consideration (in light of Roe v. Wade
    Search
  32. and Doe v. Bolton
    Search
  33. the congressional purpose under Medicaid to avoid interference with the decision of the woman and her physician. Roe v. Wade
    Search
  34. when a departmental interpretation, as here, is patently inconsistent with the controlling statute. Townsend v. Swank
    Search
  35. may Pennsylvania's exclusion force the pregnant woman to use of measures dangerous to her life and health but, as Roe v. Wade
    Search
  36. played by the attending physician in the abortion decision, and, in any event, is constitutionally invalid under Doe v. Bolton
    Search
  37. that Pennsylvania has left the abortion decision to the patient and her physician in the manner prescribed in Doe v. Bolton
    Search
  38. to term, are in reality intended to impose a moral viewpoint that no State may constitutionally enforce. Roe v. Wade
    Search
  39. of the Constitution and impose their moral choices upon the rest of society. See, e.g., Planned Parenthood of Missouri v. Danforth
    Search
  40. Smith v. Organization
    Search
  41. U. S. 816 (1977). Many children of the poor, sadly, will attend second-rate segregated schools. Cf. Milliken v. Bradley
    Search
  42. and children, so that there is little chance for the children to grow up in a decent environment. Cf. Dandridge v. Williams
    Search
  43. of these decisions is particularly obvious in its cursory discussion of appellees' equal protection claims in Maher v. Roe
    Search
  44. equal protection analysis. See generally Massachusetts Bd. of Retirement v. Murgia
    Search
  45. make its exercise difficult for some people. See Maher v. Roe
    Search
  46. the appropriate mode of analysis. To no one's surprise, application of that test -- combined with misreading of Roe v. Wade
    Search
  47. vital importance in the lives of the recipients. The right of every woman to choose whether to bear a child is, as Roe v. Wade
    Search
  48. to claim government benefits, it is surely a relevant factor in the present inquiry. See San Antonio School Dist. v. Rodriguez
    Search
  49. U.S. Supreme Court Beal v. Doe
    Search
  50. Doe v. Wohlgemuth
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial