Citation network
Milliken Vs. Bradley
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 27, 1977
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 267 (1977) U.S. Supreme Court Milliken v. BradleySearch
-
U.S. 267 (1977) Milliken v. BradleySearch
-
To the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit Syllabus After This Court, in Milliken V. BradleySearch
-
Brown v. BoardSearch
-
must on occasion be addressed by federal courts to eliminate the effects of prior segregation, United State v. MontgomerySearch
-
provide prospective equitable relief, even though such relief requires the expenditure of money by the State. Edelman v. JordanSearch
-
costs of those programs. I This case is before the Court for the second time, following our remand, Milliken v. BradleySearch
-
We reversed, holding that the order exceeded appropriate limits of federal equitable authority as defined in Swann v. Charlotte-MecklenburgSearch
-
Id. at 241-242, quoting Keyes v. SchoolSearch
-
District Court's allocation of costs between the state and local officials. Analyzing this Court's decision in Edelman v. JordanSearch
-
Brown v. BardSearch
-
nature of the desegregation remedy is to be determined by the nature and scope of the constitutional violation. Swann v. Charlotte-MecklenburgSearch
-
condition that does not violate the Constitution or does not flow from such a violation, see Pasadena Bd. of Education v. SpanglerSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
units that were neither involved in nor affected by the constitutional violation, as in Milliken I, supra. Hills v. GautreauxSearch
-
case invalidating a de jure system, a unanimous Court, speaking through Mr. Chief Justice Warren, held in Brown v. BoardSearch
-
And in United States v. MontgomerySearch
-
eliminate the effects of prior segregation. Similarly, in Swann, we reaffirmed the principle laid down in Green v. CountySearch
-
Miller v. SchoolSearch
-
United States v. JeffersonSearch
-
Board of Education, 380 F.2d 385, 394, cert. denied, 389 U.S. 840 (1967). (Emphasis supplied.) See also Stell v. BoardSearch
-
Hill v. LafourcheSearch
-
Redman v. TerrebonneSearch
-
Lee v. MaconSearch
-
Graves v. WaltonSearch
-
Plaquemines Parish School Bd v. PageSearch
-
Tammany Parish School Board, 302 F.Supp. 106, 110 (1969), aff'd, 448 F.2d 414 (CA5 1971). See also Moore v. TangipahoaSearch
-
situation warranted, continued to call for remedial education programs in desegregation plans. E.g., United States v. TexasSearch
-
F.2d 441, 448 (1971), stay denied sub nom. Edgar v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 404 U. S. 1206 (1971) (Black, J., in chambers). To that end, the approved plan in United States v. TexasSearch
-
George v. O'KellySearch
-
likewise looked in part to remedial programs, when the record supported an order to that effect. See, e.g., Morgan v. KerriganSearch
-
F.Supp. 216, 235 (Mass.1975), aff'd, 530 F.2d 401 (CA1), cert. denied sub nom. White v. MorganSearch
-
Hart v. CommunitySearch
-
Booker v. SpecialSearch
-
skills, federal courts have expressly ordered special in-service training for teachers, see, e.g., United States v. MissouriSearch
-
Moore v. TangipahoaSearch
-
altered or even suspended testing programs employed by school systems undergoing desegregation. See, e.g., Singleton v. JacksonSearch
-
Lemon v. BossierSearch
-
Arvizu v. WacoSearch
-
in this setting, it can affect any children who, as a group, are isolated by force of law from the mainstream. Cf. Lau v. NicholsSearch
-
in this case is barred under this Court's holding in Edelman v. JordanSearch
-
enforcing the express prohibitions of unlawful state conduct enacted by the Fourteenth Amendment. Cf. Fitzpatrick v. BitzerSearch
-
entities nor to mandate a particular method or structure of state or local financing. Cf. San Antonio School Dist. v. RodriguezSearch
-
In Swann v. Charlotte-MecklenburgSearch
-
programs. 318 F.Supp. 786, 803 (WDNC 1970). However, this Court's opinion did not treat the precise point. In Keyes v. SchoolSearch
-
held that the Constitution is not violated by racial imbalance in the schools, without more. Pasadena Bd. of Education v. SpanglerSearch
-
Green v. CountySearch
-
courts in school desegregation cases. 418 U.S. at 418 U. S. 763 . Cf. Austin Independent School Dist. v. UnitedSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial