Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Moses Vs. Washington

Moses vs Washington

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Dec-18-1967
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/101524

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
389 U.S. 428
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Moses

Respondent

Washington

Excerpt

moses v. washington - 389 u.s. 428 (1967) u.s. supreme court moses v. washington, 389 u.s. 428 (1967) 389 u.s. 428 moses et al. v. washington et al. appeal from the supreme court of washington. no. 246. decided december 18, 1967. 70 wash. 2d 282, 422 p.2d 775, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. l. frederick paul and frederick w. post for appellants. james e. kennedy and j. l. coniff, special assistant attorneys general of washington, for appellees. solicitor general griswold for the united states, as amicus curiae. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. mr. justice douglas is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted. mr. justice marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. page 389 u.s. 428, 429

Full Judgment

MOSES v. WASHINGTON - 389 U.S. 428 (1967)
U.S. Supreme Court MOSES v. WASHINGTON, 389 U.S. 428 (1967) 389 U.S. 428

MOSES ET AL. v. WASHINGTON ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON.
No. 246.
Decided December 18, 1967.

70 Wash. 2d 282, 422 P.2d 775, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

L. Frederick Paul and Frederick W. Post for appellants.

James E. Kennedy and J. L. Coniff, Special Assistant Attorneys General of Washington, for appellees.

Solicitor General Griswold for the United States, as amicus curiae.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 389 U.S. 428, 429



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial