Citation network
Estelle Vs. Gamble
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Nov 30, 1976
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 97 (1976) U.S. Supreme Court Estelle v. GambleSearch
-
U.S. 97 (1976) Estelle v. GambleSearch
-
was dismissed for failure to state a claim, we must take as true its handwritten pro se allegations. Cooper v. PateSearch
-
See Robinson v. CaliforniaSearch
-
has been recounted at length in prior opinions of the Court, and need not be repeated here. See, e.g., Gregg v. GeorgiaSearch
-
Amendment by comparing challenged methods of execution to concededly inhuman techniques of punishment. See Wilkerson v. UtahSearch
-
cases, however, have held that the Amendment proscribes more than physically barbarous punishments. See, e.g., Gregg v. GeorgiaSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Weems v. UnitedSearch
-
Jackson v. BishopSearch
-
Gregg v. GeorgiaSearch
-
Francis v. ResweberSearch
-
of medical care may result in pain and suffering which no one suggests would serve any penological purpose. Cf. Gregg v. GeorgiaSearch
-
is not on that basis alone to be characterized as wanton infliction of unnecessary pain. In Louisiana ex rel. Francis v. ResweberSearch
-
id. at 329 U. S. 471 , quoting Palko v. ConnecticutSearch
-
claim. The handwritten pro se document is be liberally construed. As the Court unanimously held in Haines v. KernerSearch
-
Id. at 404 U. S. 520 -521, quoting Conley v. GibsonSearch
-
The Amendment also proscribes punishments grossly disproportionate to the severity of the crime, Gregg v. GeorgiaSearch
-
U. S. 367 (1910), and it imposes substantive limits on what can be made criminal and punished, Robinson v. CaliforniaSearch
-
Spicer v. WilliamsonSearch
-
Williams v. VincentSearch
-
Thomas v. PateSearch
-
F.2d 151, 158 (CA7), cert. denied sub nom. Thomas v. CannonSearch
-
Jones v. LockhartSearch
-
Westlake v. LucasSearch
-
Fitzke v. ShappellSearch
-
Hutchens v. AlabamaSearch
-
Riley v. RhaySearch
-
Edwards v. DuncanSearch
-
Hughes v. NobleSearch
-
Wilbron v. HuttoSearch
-
Campbell v. BetoSearch
-
Tolbert v. EymanSearch
-
what is sufficient varies, their results are not inconsistent with the standard of deliberate indifference. See Page v. SharpeSearch
-
Williams v. VincentSearch
-
Gittlemacker v. PrasseSearch
-
Russell v. ShefferSearch
-
Newman v. AlabamaSearch
-
Westlake v. LucasSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Estelle v. GambleSearch
-
See Wilkerson v. UtahSearch
-
Francis v. ResweberSearch
-
Cf. Gregg v. GeorgiaSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial