Citation network
Daniel Vs. Louisiana
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 27, 1975
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
- Relied / Followed
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 31 (1975) U.S. Supreme Court Daniel v. LouisianaSearch
-
U.S. 31 (1975) Daniel v. LouisianaSearch
-
U.S. 31 ON APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA Syllabus The decision in Taylor v. LouisianaSearch
-
as a matter of federal law, to convictions obtained by juries empaneled prior to the date of that decision. DeStefano v. WoodsSearch
-
was denied, and this denial was affirmed on appeal to the Louisiana Supreme Court. 297 So.2d 417 (1974). In Taylor v. LouisianaSearch
-
a fair cross section Page 420 U. S. 32 of the community. The question is whether our decision in Taylor v. LouisianaSearch
-
law, to convictions obtained by juries empaneled prior to the date of that decision. As we stated in Taylor v. LouisianaSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
the question of the retroactive application of Taylor is clearly controlled by our decision in DeStefano v. WoodsSearch
-
U. S. 631 (1968), where we held Duncan v. LouisianaSearch
-
U. S. 145 (1968), to be applicable only prospectively. The three relevant factors, as identified in Stovall v. DennoSearch
-
U. S. 33 of law enforcement officials and state legislatures on prior decisions of this Court, such as Hoyt v. FloridaSearch
-
Tehan v. UnitedSearch
-
Desist v. UnitedSearch
-
Mackey v. UnitedSearch
-
Adams v. IllinoisSearch
-
U. S. 433 , 417 U. S. 464 . MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, dissenting. The decision in Taylor v. LouisianaSearch
-
standards of procedural due process. I have recorded my dissents in other like situations, e.g., Stovall v. DennoSearch
-
Johnson v. NewSearch
-
When Miranda v. ArizonaSearch
-
He would remand the cases for a new trial, it being clear from the records that the principles announced in Miranda v. ArizonaSearch
-
these petitioners, all of these cases having come here on direct review and being of the same vintage as Miranda v. ArizonaSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Daniel v. LouisianaSearch
-
Taylor v. LouisianaSearch
-
In Taylor v. LouisianaSearch
-
Duncan v. LouisianaSearch
-
Hoyt v. FloridaSearch
-
Tehan v. UnitedSearch
-
Miranda v. ArizonaSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial