Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Whisman Vs. Georgia

Whisman vs Georgia

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Jun-20-1966
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/101349

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
384 U.S. 895
Subject
MRTP

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

MRTP

Key legal issue
MRTP

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Whisman

Respondent

Georgia

Excerpt

whisman v. georgia - 384 u.s. 895 (1966) u.s. supreme court whisman v. georgia, 384 u.s. 895 (1966) 384 u.s. 895 whisman v. georgia. appeal from the supreme court of georgia. no. 1381, misc. decided june 20, 1966. 221 ga. 460, 145 s. e. 2d 499, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. reuben a. garland and beryl h. weiner for appellant. arthur k. bolton, attorney general of georgia, and alfred l. evans, jr., assistant attorney general, for appellee. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. mr. justice douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted and the judgment reversed. he would remand the case for a new trial, it being clear from the record that the principles announced in miranda v. arizona, ante, p. 436, were not applied. he sees no reason for discriminating against this petitioner, the case having come here on direct review and being of the same vintage as miranda v. arizona. see dissenting opinion in johnson v. new jersey, ante, at 736. page 384 u.s. 895, 1

Full Judgment

WHISMAN v. GEORGIA - 384 U.S. 895 (1966)
U.S. Supreme Court WHISMAN v. GEORGIA, 384 U.S. 895 (1966) 384 U.S. 895

WHISMAN v. GEORGIA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF GEORGIA.
No. 1381, Misc.
Decided June 20, 1966.

221 Ga. 460, 145 S. E. 2d 499, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reuben A. Garland and Beryl H. Weiner for appellant.

Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General of Georgia, and Alfred L. Evans, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted and the judgment reversed. He would remand the case for a new trial, it being clear from the record that the principles announced in Miranda v. Arizona, ante, p. 436, were not applied. He sees no reason for discriminating against this petitioner, the case having come here on direct review and being of the same vintage as Miranda v. Arizona. See dissenting opinion in Johnson v. New Jersey, ante, at 736.

Page 384 U.S. 895, 1



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial