Citation network
Gooding Vs. United States
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Apr 29, 1974
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Gooding v. UnitedSearch
-
States - 416 U.S. 430 (1974) U.S. Supreme Court Gooding v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 416 U.S. 430 (1974) Gooding v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. StallingsSearch
-
United States v. CastleSearch
-
See Thomas v. UnitedSearch
-
of Title 23 in searches for violations of the local drug laws in the District of Columbia. See United States v. ThomasSearch
-
We note that the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has recently reached the same conclusion. See United States v. ThomasSearch
-
Amendment was intended to protect our reasonable expectations of privacy from unjustified governmental intrusion. Katz v. UnitedSearch
-
produced by an ordinary search. Mr. Justice Harlan observed, in holding a night-time search unconstitutional in Jones v. UnitedSearch
-
In Coolidge v. NewSearch
-
And our decision in Griswold v. ConnecticutSearch
-
increasingly severe standards of probable cause are necessary to justify increasingly intrusive searches. In Camara v. MunicipalSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Id. at 387 U. S. 537 . See also Terry v. OhioSearch
-
Couch v. UnitedSearch
-
a showing of additional justification for a search over and above the ordinary showing of probable cause. Cf. Stanford v. TexasSearch
-
a showing that the objects to be seized will probably be found on the premises at the time of the search. See Sgro v. UnitedSearch
-
Schoeneman v. UnitedSearch
-
Rosencranz v. UnitedSearch
-
a) -- the language in controversy here -- totally without meaning. See United States v. ThomasSearch
-
statutory language, even they must be disregarded if inconsistent with the plain language of the statute. Helvering v. CitySearch
-
George Van Camp & Sons Co. v. AmericanSearch
-
Girouard v. UnitedSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Gooding v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. StallingsSearch
-
the District of Columbia. See United States v. ThomasSearch
-
See United States v. ThomasSearch
-
Katz v. UnitedSearch
-
Jones v. UnitedSearch
-
In Camara v. MunicipalSearch
-
Terry v. OhioSearch
-
Cf. Stanford v. TexasSearch
-
See Sgro v. UnitedSearch
-
Helvering v. CitySearch
-
United States v. OregonSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial