Citation network
Ely Vs. Klahr
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 07, 1971
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 108 (1971) U.S. Supreme Court Ely v. KlahrSearch
-
U.S. 108 (1971) Ely v. KlahrSearch
-
we affirm the judgment of the District Court. In April, 1964, shortly before this Court's decision in Reynolds v. SimsSearch
-
Klahr v. GoddardSearch
-
and Congress. It ordered those elections to be held in accordance with its own 1966 plan, as supplemented. Klahr v. WilliamsSearch
-
thereafter. The court properly concluded that this plan was invalid under Kirkpatrick v. PreislerSearch
-
U. S. 526 (1969), and Wells v. RockefellerSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
to serve the 1970 election, whose preliminary preparations were to begin in a few weeks. Klahr v. WilliamsSearch
-
and the intervening decisions of this Court in Kirkpatrick and Wells, supra, and Burns v. RichardsonSearch
-
can become law where, as here, sufficient signatures against the bill are filed with the Secretary of State. See Klahr v. WilliamsSearch
-
Though we noted in Burns v. RichardsonSearch
-
E.g., Reynolds v. SimsSearch
-
and American Indians. In light of our disposition of this case, we need only advert to our admonition in Burns v. RichardsonSearch
-
The District Court also retained jurisdiction of the cause. 313 F.Supp. 148. Since Reynolds v. SimsSearch
-
lifted a year later on the showing that the literacy tests had not been used in a discriminatory manner. Apache County v. UnitedSearch
-
As of last fall, Yuma County was subject to the literacy test ban of the Voting Rights Act of 1965. See Oregon v. MitchellSearch
-
end. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN concurs in the result upon the premises set forth in his separate opinions in Whitcomb v. ChavisSearch
-
and Reynolds v. SimsSearch
-
which is defined, inter alia, to include literacy. This part of the Act was upheld in Oregon v. MitchellSearch
-
upheld the requirement, and we heard oral argument after the election was over. The case was dismissed as moot. Hall v. BealsSearch
-
U. S. 45 . Durational residency requirements have come before the Court several times this Term. In Hayes v. LieutenantSearch
-
came up for consideration on the merits, again after the election, it was dismissed as moot, 401 U.S. 968. In Sirak v. BrownSearch
-
Court denied an injunction, 400 U.S. 809, the plaintiff chose not to docket his appeal, probably on the basis of Hall v. BealsSearch
-
supra. A similar issue was present in Fitzpatrick v. BoardSearch
-
Chicago, where we denied a motion to expedite the appeal, 401 U.S. 905. Had all the lower courts followed Drueding v. DevlinSearch
-
requirements. This avoids the mootness issue, and we have noted probable jurisdiction in one such case, Ellington v. BlumsteinSearch
-
U.S. 934. In Beller v. KirkSearch
-
relief was denied by individual Justices early in October, but the case has subsequently been docketed sub nom. Beller v. AskewSearch
-
No. 1360. We have heard oral argument on the same issue in Jenness v. FortsonSearch
-
By that decision, several sections of the Ohio laws were invalidated, and we noted probable jurisdiction. Gilligan v. SweetenhamSearch
-
U.S. 991. A loyalty oath was upheld, and we noted probable jurisdiction in that case. Socialist Labor Party v. GilliganSearch
-
upheld a provision requiring independent candidates to file at the same time as major party candidates. Sweetenham v. GilliganSearch
-
No. 790. A similar issue is also presented in Pratt v. BegleySearch
-
Chicago election in April, 1971, also presented cases where one of the parties needed immediate action. In Jackson v. OgilvieSearch
-
S. 904 , and there was no way the case could be heard prior to the election. Through all these cases, Williams v. RhodesSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Ely v. KlahrSearch
-
Klahr v. WilliamsSearch
-
and Wells v. RockefellerSearch
-
and Burns v. RichardsonSearch
-
the Secretary of State. See Klahr v. WilliamsSearch
-
Since Reynolds v. SimsSearch
-
Apache County v. UnitedSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial