Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Drueding Vs. Devlin

Drueding vs Devlin

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Mar-01-1965
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/101223

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
380 U.S. 125
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Drueding

Respondent

Devlin

Excerpt

drueding v. devlin - 380 u.s. 125 (1965) u.s. supreme court drueding v. devlin, 380 u.s. 125 (1965) 380 u.s. 125 drueding et al. v. devlin et al. appeal from the united states district court for the district of maryland. no. 772. decided march 1, 1965. 234 f. supp. 721, affirmed. lawrence speiser, allison w. brown, jr., and edward l. genn for appellants. per curiam. the judgment is affirmed. page 380 u.s. 125, 126 city of coronado v. san diego, 380 u.s. 125 (1965) 380 u.s. 125 (1965) "> u.s. supreme court city of coronado v. san diego, 380 u.s. 125 (1965) 380 u.s. 125 city of coronado et al. v. san diego unified port district et al. appeal from the district court of appeal of california, fourth appellate district. no. 763. decided march 1, 1965. appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. reported below: 227 cal. app. 2d 455, 38 cal. rptr. 834. george a. blackstone for appellants. aaron w. reese and burnham enersen for san diego unified port district et al., and thomas c. lynch, attorney general, and ariel c. hilton, deputy attorney general, for the state of california, appellees. per curiam. the motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Full Judgment

DRUEDING v. DEVLIN - 380 U.S. 125 (1965)
U.S. Supreme Court DRUEDING v. DEVLIN, 380 U.S. 125 (1965) 380 U.S. 125

DRUEDING ET AL. v. DEVLIN ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND.
No. 772.
Decided March 1, 1965.

234 F. Supp. 721, affirmed.

Lawrence Speiser, Allison W. Brown, Jr., and Edward L. Genn for appellants.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed.

Page 380 U.S. 125, 126


CITY OF CORONADO v. SAN DIEGO, <a href="/101223"> 380 U.S. 125 </a> (1965) 380 U.S. 125 (1965) "> U.S. Supreme Court CITY OF CORONADO v. SAN DIEGO, 380 U.S. 125 (1965) 380 U.S. 125

CITY OF CORONADO ET AL. v. SAN DIEGO UNIFIED PORT DISTRICT ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE
DISTRICT. No. 763.
Decided March 1, 1965.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 227 Cal. App. 2d 455, 38 Cal. Rptr. 834.

George A. Blackstone for appellants.

Aaron W. Reese and Burnham Enersen for San Diego Unified Port District et al., and Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General, and Ariel C. Hilton, Deputy Attorney General, for the State of California, appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial