Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Gordon Vs. Lance

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jun 07, 1971

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

33 entries 5 linked 28 unlinked
Show
  1. Gray Vs. Sanders US Supreme Court · Mar 18, 1963
  2. Gomillion Vs. Lightfoot US Supreme Court · Nov 14, 1960
  3. Carrington Vs. Rash US Supreme Court · Mar 01, 1965
  4. Hunter Vs. Erickson US Supreme Court · Jan 20, 1969
  5. Turner Vs. Clay US Supreme Court · Feb 24, 1970
    Relied / Followed
  6. U.S. 1 (1971) U.S. Supreme Court Gordon v. Lance
    Search
  7. U.S. 1 (1971) Gordon v. Lance
    Search
  8. class, and does not violate the Equal Protection Clause or any other provision of the United States Constitution. Gray v. Sanders
    Search
  9. U. S. 368 , and Cipriano v. City
    Search
  10. on two of our holdings dealing with limitations on the right to vote and dilution of voting power. The first was Gray v. Sanders
    Search
  11. electors in one county were accorded less weight than the votes of electors in other counties. The second was Cipriano v. City
    Search
  12. individual may not be denied access to the ballot because of some extraneous condition, such as race, e.g., Gomillion v. Lightfoot
    Search
  13. wealth, e.g., Harper v. Virginia
    Search
  14. tax status, e.g., Kramer v. Union
    Search
  15. or military status, e.g., Carrington v. Rash
    Search
  16. for any purpose, whether for schools, sewers, or highways. We are not, therefore, presented with a case like Hunter v. Erickson
    Search
  17. from the franchise because of the way they will vote. Cf. Carrington v. Rash
    Search
  18. the selection of a Governor by a state legislature after no candidate received a majority of the popular vote. Fortson v. Morris
    Search
  19. Cf. Clay v. Thornton
    Search
  20. S.C. 209, 169 S.E.2d Page 403 U. S. 8 617 (1969), appeal dismissed sub nom. Turner v. Clay
    Search
  21. Reversed. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN concurs in the result for the reasons stated in his separate opinion in Whitcomb v. Chavis
    Search
  22. individual's voting power in proportion to the amount of property he owned would be similarly defective. See Stewart v. Parish
    Search
  23. Compare Reitman v. Mulkey
    Search
  24. U.S. Supreme Court Gordon v. Lance
    Search
  25. of the United States Constitution. Gray v. Sanders
    Search
  26. and Cipriano v. City
    Search
  27. Cipriano v. City
    Search
  28. Harper v. Virginia
    Search
  29. Kramer v. Union
    Search
  30. Cf. Carrington v. Rash
    Search
  31. See Stewart v. Parish
    Search
  32. Fortson v. Morris
    Search
  33. Whitcomb v. Chavis
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial