Turner Vs. Clay

Turner vs Clay

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Feb-24-1970

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/102638

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/102638
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: Feb-24-1970
Case Number: 397 U.S. 39
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Turner

Respondent

Clay

Excerpt

turner v. clay - 397 u.s. 39 (1970) u.s. supreme court turner v. clay, 397 u.s. 39 (1970) 397 u.s. 39 turner et al. v. clay et al. appeal from the supreme court of south carolina. no. 982. decided february 24, 1970 253 s. c. 209, 169 s. e. 2d 617, appeal dismissed. harry m. lightsey, jr., for appellants. huger sinkler for clay et al., and daniel r. mcleod, attorney general of south carolina, and c. tolbert goolsby, jr., assistant attorney general, for thornton, secretary of state of south carolina, appellees. per curiam. the motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. page 397 u.s. 39, 40

Full Judgment

TURNER v. CLAY - 397 U.S. 39 (1970)
U.S. Supreme Court TURNER v. CLAY, 397 U.S. 39 (1970) 397 U.S. 39

TURNER ET AL. v. CLAY ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH CAROLINA.
No. 982.
Decided February 24, 1970

253 S. C. 209, 169 S. E. 2d 617, appeal dismissed.

Harry M. Lightsey, Jr., for appellants.

Huger Sinkler for Clay et al., and Daniel R. McLeod, Attorney General of South Carolina, and C. Tolbert Goolsby, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for Thornton, Secretary of State of South Carolina, appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 397 U.S. 39, 40

Same Court & Year US Supreme Court · 1970 Same Parties Turner vs Clay Same Subject Land Acquisition