Skip to content


Turner Vs. Clay - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation

Court

US Supreme Court

Decided On

Case Number

397 U.S. 39

Appellant

Turner

Respondent

Clay

Excerpt:


turner v. clay - 397 u.s. 39 (1970) u.s. supreme court turner v. clay, 397 u.s. 39 (1970) 397 u.s. 39 turner et al. v. clay et al. appeal from the supreme court of south carolina. no. 982. decided february 24, 1970 253 s. c. 209, 169 s. e. 2d 617, appeal dismissed. harry m. lightsey, jr., for appellants. huger sinkler for clay et al., and daniel r. mcleod, attorney general of south carolina, and c. tolbert goolsby, jr., assistant attorney general, for thornton, secretary of state of south carolina, appellees. per curiam. the motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. page 397 u.s. 39, 40

Judgment:


TURNER v. CLAY - 397 U.S. 39 (1970)
U.S. Supreme Court TURNER v. CLAY, 397 U.S. 39 (1970) 397 U.S. 39

TURNER ET AL. v. CLAY ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH CAROLINA.
No. 982.
Decided February 24, 1970

253 S. C. 209, 169 S. E. 2d 617, appeal dismissed.

Harry M. Lightsey, Jr., for appellants.

Huger Sinkler for Clay et al., and Daniel R. McLeod, Attorney General of South Carolina, and C. Tolbert Goolsby, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for Thornton, Secretary of State of South Carolina, appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 397 U.S. 39, 40




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //