Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Whitus Vs. Georgia

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jan 23, 1967

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

30 entries 4 linked 26 unlinked
Show
  1. Norris Vs. Alabama US Supreme Court · Apr 01, 1935
  2. Pierre Vs. Louisiana US Supreme Court · Feb 27, 1939
  3. Whitus Vs. Balkcom US Supreme Court · Jun 25, 1962
  4. Eubanks Vs. Louisiana US Supreme Court · May 26, 1958
    Distinguished
  5. U.S. 545 (1967) U.S. Supreme Court Whitus v. Georgia
    Search
  6. U.S. 545 (1967) Whitus v. Georgia
    Search
  7. jurors was denied, petitioners were put to trial and were convicted. The Supreme Court of Georgia affirmed. Whitus v. State
    Search
  8. Davis v. State
    Search
  9. have been here twice before. They were originally convicted in 1960, and the Supreme Court of Georgia affirmed. Davis v. State
    Search
  10. Whitus v. State
    Search
  11. the case to the District Court for a hearing on the claim of discrimination. Page 385 U. S. 548 Whitus v. Balkcom
    Search
  12. Appeals reversed, holding that Negroes had been systematically excluded from both the grand and petit juries. Whitus v. Balkcom
    Search
  13. within the memory of the witnesses. II After the Court of Appeals set aside the first convictions, Whitus v. Balkcom
    Search
  14. of a petit jury from which Negroes were excluded by reason Page 385 U. S. 550 of their race. Strauder v. West
    Search
  15. Pierre v. Louisiana
    Search
  16. The burden is, of course, on the petitioners to prove the existence of purposeful discrimination, Tarrance v. Florida
    Search
  17. the jury list because of race or color, this has been held insufficient to overcome the prima facie case. Norris v. Alabama
    Search
  18. in reversing the original convictions. We believe that the circumstances here are akin to those condemned in Avery v. Georgia
    Search
  19. Williams v. Georgia
    Search
  20. that the commissioners selected prospective jurors on the basis of personal acquaintance correct the evil. See Cassell v. Texas
    Search
  21. proper disposition where a state court conviction is set aside on the ground of jury discrimination is stated in Hill v. Texas
    Search
  22. Patton v. Mississippi
    Search
  23. Together with No. 253, Whitus et al. v. Georgia
    Search
  24. U.S. Supreme Court Whitus v. Georgia
    Search
  25. Strauder v. West
    Search
  26. Tarrance v. Florida
    Search
  27. Avery v. Georgia
    Search
  28. See Cassell v. Texas
    Search
  29. Hill v. Texas
    Search
  30. Patton v. Mississippi
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial