Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Whitus Vs. Balkcom

Whitus vs Balkcom

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Jun-25-1962
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/100297

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
370 U.S. 728
Subject
Miscellaneous

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Miscellaneous

Key legal issue
Miscellaneous

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Whitus

Respondent

Balkcom

Excerpt

whitus v. balkcom - 370 u.s. 728 (1962) u.s. supreme court whitus v. balkcom, 370 u.s. 728 (1962) 370 u.s. 728 whitus v. balkcom, warden. on petition for writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the fifth circuit. no. 1357, misc. decided june 25, 1962. certiorari granted; judgment vacated; case remanded to the district court for a hearing on the merits of the petition for writ of habeas corpus. reported below: 299 f.2d 844 . petitioner pro se. eugene cook, attorney general of georgia, and howard p. wallace, assistant attorney general, for respondent. per curiam. the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the united states district court for the southern district of georgia for a hearing on the merits of the petition for writ of habeas corpus. mr. justice frankfurter took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. page 370 u.s. 728, 1

Full Judgment

WHITUS v. BALKCOM - 370 U.S. 728 (1962)
U.S. Supreme Court WHITUS v. BALKCOM, 370 U.S. 728 (1962) 370 U.S. 728

WHITUS v. BALKCOM, WARDEN.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 1357, Misc.
Decided June 25, 1962.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; case remanded to the District Court for a hearing on the merits of the petition for writ of habeas corpus.

Reported below: 299 F.2d 844 .

Petitioner pro se.

Eugene Cook, Attorney General of Georgia, and Howard P. Wallace, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia for a hearing on the merits of the petition for writ of habeas corpus.

MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 370 U.S. 728, 1



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial