Citation network
Coppedge Vs. United States
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Apr 30, 1962
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Coppedge v. UnitedSearch
-
States - 369 U.S. 438 (1962) U.S. Supreme Court Coppedge v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 369 U.S. 438 (1962) Coppedge v. UnitedSearch
-
Ellis v. UnitedSearch
-
But we have granted certiorari and given full consideration to related issues in other cases. See, e.g., Costello v. UnitedSearch
-
Lawn v. UnitedSearch
-
of Appeals has applied an erroneous standard in passing on an indigent's application for leave to appeal. Johnson v. UnitedSearch
-
Farley v. UnitedSearch
-
Delbridge v. UnitedSearch
-
Edwards v. UnitedSearch
-
Hill v. UnitedSearch
-
Cash v. UnitedSearch
-
Hansford v. UnitedSearch
-
Kitchens v. UnitedSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Smith v. UnitedSearch
-
McAbee v. UnitedSearch
-
Lurk v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 366 U. S. 712 . See also Page v. UnitedSearch
-
Willis v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 362 U. S. 216 . Cf. Simcox v. MadiganSearch
-
Fed.Rules Crim.Proc. 37(a). Cf. Carroll v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. RobinsonSearch
-
the timely filing of a notice of appeal is a jurisdictional prerequisite for perfecting an appeal, United States v. RobinsonSearch
-
of notices of appeal, has been used to preserve the jurisdiction of the Courts of Appeals. See, e.g., Lemke v. UnitedSearch
-
O'Neal v. UnitedSearch
-
Tillman v. UnitedSearch
-
Belton v. UnitedSearch
-
Williams v. UnitedSearch
-
C. 212, 188 F.2d 41 (notice of appeal delivered to prison officials for forwarding to District Court). See also Jordan v. UnitedSearch
-
States District Court, 98 U.S.App.D.C. 160, 233 F.2d 362, vacated on other grounds sub nom. Jordan v. UnitedSearch
-
West v. UnitedSearch
-
of the requirement for filing a prompt notice of appeal, the right of appeal may irrevocably be lost. Cf. Hodges v. UnitedSearch
-
Lewis and Simms v. UnitedSearch
-
a). And this is the manner in which the statute has been interpreted. See, e.g., West v. UnitedSearch
-
Waterman v. McMillanSearch
-
Murrey v. UnitedSearch
-
Bayless v. JohnstonSearch
-
C.A.9th Cir.). And see Rules of the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit 41(a). But cf. Jordan v. UnitedSearch
-
States District Court, 98 U.S.App.D.C. 160, 163, 233 F.2d 362, 365 note 3, vacated on other grounds sub nom. Jordan v. UnitedSearch
-
Cong.Rec. 1533 (1910). However, he was discussing primarily civil suits. And see Jaffe v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 246 F.2d 760 (C.A.2d Cir.) (civil case). But, in criminal cases, cf. Cash v. UnitedSearch
-
Parsell v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 218 F.2d 232 (C.A.5th Cir.). See also United States v. ViscontiSearch
-
Civil Procedure would be applicable as they are to appeals in other ancillary post-conviction proceedings. Cf. Roberts v. UnitedSearch
-
Johnson v. UnitedSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Coppedge v. UnitedSearch
-
Costello v. UnitedSearch
-
Page v. UnitedSearch
-
Cf. Simcox v. MadiganSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial