Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Ragan Vs. Cox

Ragan vs Cox

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Apr-23-1962
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/100360

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
369 U.S. 437
Subject
Miscellaneous

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Miscellaneous

Key legal issue
Miscellaneous

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ragan

Respondent

Cox

Excerpt

ragan v. cox - 369 u.s. 437 (1962) u.s. supreme court ragan v. cox, 369 u.s. 437 (1962) 369 u.s. 437 ragan v. cox, commandant. on petition for writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the tenth circuit. no. 634, misc. decided april 23, 1962. certiorari granted; order of court of appeals vacated insofar as it denies petitioner leave to proceed in forma pauperis; case remanded to that court for further proceedings. petitioner pro se. solicitor general cox, assistant attorney general marshall and harold h. greene for respondent. per curiam. in accordance with the suggestion of the solicitor general and upon consideration of the entire record, the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. the order of the court of appeals, insofar as it denies petitioner leave to proceed in forma pauperis, is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further proceedings. simcox v. madigan, 366 u.s. 765 . mr. justice frankfurter took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. page 369 u.s. 437, 438

Full Judgment

RAGAN v. COX - 369 U.S. 437 (1962)
U.S. Supreme Court RAGAN v. COX, 369 U.S. 437 (1962) 369 U.S. 437

RAGAN v. COX, COMMANDANT.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT. No. 634, Misc.
Decided April 23, 1962.

Certiorari granted; order of Court of Appeals vacated insofar as it denies petitioner leave to proceed in forma pauperis; case remanded to that court for further proceedings.

Petitioner pro se.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Marshall and Harold H. Greene for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

In accordance with the suggestion of the Solicitor General and upon consideration of the entire record, the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The order of the Court of Appeals, insofar as it denies petitioner leave to proceed in forma pauperis, is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further proceedings. Simcox v. Madigan, 366 U.S. 765 .

MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 369 U.S. 437, 438



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial