Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Venus Vs. United States

Venus vs United States

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Dec-18-1961
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/99986

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
368 U.S. 345
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Venus

Respondent

United States

Excerpt

venus v. united states - 368 u.s. 345 (1961) u.s. supreme court venus v. united states, 368 u.s. 345 (1961) 368 u.s. 345 venus v. united states. certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the ninth circuit. no. 75. argued december 14, 1961. decided december 18, 1961. judgment reversed with instructions to dismiss the indictment. reported below: 287 f.2d 304 . hayden c. covington argued the cause and filed briefs for petitioner. jerome m. feit argued the cause for the united states. with him on the briefs were solicitor general cox, assistant attorney general miller and beatrice rosenberg. per curiam. the judgment is reversed with instructions to dismiss the indictment. ward v. united states, 344 u.s. 924, reversing 195 f.2d 441 (c. a. 5th cir.). dutton v. tawes, 368 u.s. 345 (1961) 368 u.s. 345 (1961) "> u.s. supreme court dutton v. tawes, 368 u.s. 345 (1961) 368 u.s. 345 dutton et al. v. tawes, governor of maryland. appeal from the court of appeals of maryland. no. 533. decided december 18, 1961. appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. reported below: 225 md. 484, 171 a. 2d 688. hyman a. pressman for appellants. thomas b. finan, attorney general of maryland, and joseph s. kaufman, deputy attorney general, for appellee. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. page 368 u.s. 345, 346

Full Judgment

VENUS v. UNITED STATES - 368 U.S. 345 (1961)
U.S. Supreme Court VENUS v. UNITED STATES, 368 U.S. 345 (1961) 368 U.S. 345

VENUS v. UNITED STATES.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT.
No. 75.
Argued December 14, 1961.
Decided December 18, 1961.

Judgment reversed with instructions to dismiss the indictment.

Reported below: 287 F.2d 304 .

Hayden C. Covington argued the cause and filed briefs for petitioner.

Jerome M. Feit argued the cause for the United States. With him on the briefs were Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller and Beatrice Rosenberg.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is reversed with instructions to dismiss the indictment. Ward v. United States, 344 U.S. 924, reversing 195 F.2d 441 (C. A. 5th Cir.).


DUTTON v. TAWES, <a href="/99986"> 368 U.S. 345 </a> (1961) 368 U.S. 345 (1961) "> U.S. Supreme Court DUTTON v. TAWES, 368 U.S. 345 (1961) 368 U.S. 345

DUTTON ET AL. v. TAWES, GOVERNOR OF MARYLAND.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND.
No. 533.
Decided December 18, 1961.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 225 Md. 484, 171 A. 2d 688.

Hyman A. Pressman for appellants.

Thomas B. Finan, Attorney General of Maryland, and Joseph S. Kaufman, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 368 U.S. 345, 346



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial