Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Gair Vs. Peck

Gair vs Peck

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Jan-25-1960
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/99960

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
361 U.S. 374
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Gair

Respondent

Peck

Excerpt

gair v. peck - 361 u.s. 374 (1960) u.s. supreme court gair v. peck, 361 u.s. 374 (1960) 361 u.s. 374 gair et al. v. peck et al. appeal from the supreme court of new york, new york county. no. 544. decided january 25, 1960. appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. reported below: 6 n. y. 2d 97, 160 n. e. 2d 43. howard hilton spellman for appellants. louis j. lefkowitz, attorney general of new york, and james o. moore, jr. for appellees. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. taylor v. taylor, 361 u.s. 374 (1960) 361 u.s. 374 (1960) "> u.s. supreme court taylor v. taylor, 361 u.s. 374 (1960) 361 u.s. 374 taylor v. taylor. appeal from the supreme court of kansas. no. 552. decided january 25, 1960. appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. reported below: 185 kan. 324, 342 p.2d 190. f. l. hagaman for appellant. per curiam. the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. page 361 u.s. 374, 375

Full Judgment

GAIR v. PECK - 361 U.S. 374 (1960)
U.S. Supreme Court GAIR v. PECK, 361 U.S. 374 (1960) 361 U.S. 374

GAIR ET AL. v. PECK ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK COUNTY.
No. 544.
Decided January 25, 1960.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 6 N. Y. 2d 97, 160 N. E. 2d 43.

Howard Hilton Spellman for appellants.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, and James O. Moore, Jr. for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.


TAYLOR v. TAYLOR, <a href="/99960"> 361 U.S. 374 </a> (1960) 361 U.S. 374 (1960) "> U.S. Supreme Court TAYLOR v. TAYLOR, 361 U.S. 374 (1960) 361 U.S. 374

TAYLOR v. TAYLOR.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF KANSAS.
No. 552.
Decided January 25, 1960.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 185 Kan. 324, 342 P.2d 190.

F. L. Hagaman for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 361 U.S. 374, 375



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial