Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Cerminaro Vs. Urban Redevelopment Auth. of Pittsburgh

Cerminaro vs Urban Redevelopment Auth. of Pittsburgh

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Apr-25-1960
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/99908

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
362 U.S. 457
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Cerminaro

Respondent

Urban Redevelopment Auth. of Pittsburgh

Excerpt

cerminaro v. urban redevelopment auth. of pittsburgh - 362 u.s. 457 (1960) u.s. supreme court cerminaro v. urban redevelopment auth. of pittsburgh, 362 u.s. 457 (1960) 362 u.s. 457 cerminaro v. urban redevelopment authority of pittsburgh et al. appeal from the united states district court for the western district of pennsylvania. no. 654, misc. decided april 25, 1960. appeal dismissed. reported below: ___ f. supp. ___. louis c. glasso for appellant. theodore l. hazlett, jr. and david stahl for appellees. per curiam. the appeal is dismissed. cleveland electric illuminating co. v. city of euclid, 362 u.s. 457 (1960) 362 u.s. 457 (1960) "> u.s. supreme court cleveland electric illuminating co. v. city of euclid, 362 u.s. 457 (1960) 362 u.s. 457 cleveland electric illuminating co. v. city of euclid, ohio, et al. appeal from the supreme court of ohio. no. 740. decided april 25, 1960. appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. reported below: 170 ohio st. 45, 162 n. e. 2d 125. john lansdale for appellant. paul h. torbet and john f. ray, jr. for appellees. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. page 362 u.s. 457, 458

Full Judgment

CERMINARO v. URBAN REDEVELOPMENT AUTH. OF PITTSBURGH - 362 U.S. 457 (1960)
U.S. Supreme Court CERMINARO v. URBAN REDEVELOPMENT AUTH. OF PITTSBURGH, 362 U.S. 457 (1960) 362 U.S. 457

CERMINARO v. URBAN REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF PITTSBURGH ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF
PENNSYLVANIA. No. 654, Misc.
Decided April 25, 1960.

Appeal dismissed.

Reported below: ___ F. Supp. ___.

Louis C. Glasso for appellant.

Theodore L. Hazlett, Jr. and David Stahl for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed.


CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO. v. CITY OF EUCLID, <a href="/99908"> 362 U.S. 457 </a> (1960) 362 U.S. 457 (1960) "> U.S. Supreme Court CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO. v. CITY OF EUCLID, 362 U.S. 457 (1960) 362 U.S. 457

CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO. v. CITY OF EUCLID, OHIO, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.
No. 740.
Decided April 25, 1960.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 170 Ohio St. 45, 162 N. E. 2d 125.

John Lansdale for appellant.

Paul H. Torbet and John F. Ray, Jr. for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 362 U.S. 457, 458



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial