Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

Helm Vs. Arizona

Helm vs Arizona

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided May-16-1960
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/99900

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
362 U.S. 609
Subject
MRTP

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

MRTP

Key legal issue
MRTP

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Helm

Respondent

Arizona

Excerpt

helm v. arizona - 362 u.s. 609 (1960) u.s. supreme court helm v. arizona, 362 u.s. 609 (1960) 362 u.s. 609 helm et al. v. arizona. appeal from the supreme court of arizona. no. 768. decided may 16, 1960. appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. reported below: 86 ariz. 275, 345 p.2d 202. irving a. jennings for appellants. wade church, attorney general of arizona, leslie c. hardy, chief assistant attorney general, and jay dushoff, assistant attorney general, for appellee. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. page 362 u.s. 609, 610

Full Judgment

HELM v. ARIZONA - 362 U.S. 609 (1960)
U.S. Supreme Court HELM v. ARIZONA, 362 U.S. 609 (1960) 362 U.S. 609

HELM ET AL. v. ARIZONA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA.
No. 768.
Decided May 16, 1960.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 86 Ariz. 275, 345 P.2d 202.

Irving A. Jennings for appellants.

Wade Church, Attorney General of Arizona, Leslie C. Hardy, Chief Assistant Attorney General, and Jay Dushoff, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 362 U.S. 609, 610



Continue Your Research

Same Parties Helm vs Arizona Same Subject MRTP
MRTP

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales