Levitt and Sons Inc., Vs. Division Against Discrimination

Levitt and Sons Inc., vs Division Against Discrimination

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Jun-13-1960

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/99870

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/99870
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: Jun-13-1960
Case Number: 363 U.S. 418
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Levitt and Sons Inc.,

Respondent

Division Against Discrimination

Excerpt

levitt & sons inc., v. division against discrimination - 363 u.s. 418 (1960) u.s. supreme court levitt & sons inc., v. division against discrimination, 363 u.s. 418 (1960) 363 u.s. 418 levitt & sons, inc., v. division against discrimination in state department of education et al. appeal from the supreme court of new jersey. no. 865. decided june 13, 1960. appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. reported below: 31 n. j. 514, 158 a. 2d 177. william p. reiss for appellant. david d. furman, attorney general of new jersey, and lee a. holley, deputy attorney general, for appellee division against discrimination. emerson l. darnell and sidney reitman for appellee willie r. james; jerome c. eisenberg and herbert h. tate for appellee franklin d. todd; and julius wildstein of counsel, and joseph b. robinson on the brief, for both individual appellees. per curiam. the motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. mr. justice black would note probable jurisdiction. page 363 u.s. 418, 419

Full Judgment

LEVITT & SONS INC., v. DIVISION AGAINST DISCRIMINATION - 363 U.S. 418 (1960)
U.S. Supreme Court LEVITT & SONS INC., v. DIVISION AGAINST DISCRIMINATION, 363 U.S. 418 (1960) 363 U.S. 418

LEVITT & SONS, INC., v. DIVISION AGAINST DISCRIMINATION IN STATE DEPARTMENT
OF EDUCATION ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY. No. 865.
Decided June 13, 1960.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 31 N. J. 514, 158 A. 2d 177.

William P. Reiss for appellant.

David D. Furman, Attorney General of New Jersey, and Lee A. Holley, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee Division Against Discrimination.

Emerson L. Darnell and Sidney Reitman for appellee Willie R. James; Jerome C. Eisenberg and Herbert H. Tate for appellee Franklin D. Todd; and Julius Wildstein of counsel, and Joseph B. Robinson on the brief, for both individual appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK would note probable jurisdiction.

Page 363 U.S. 418, 419