Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Mccrary Vs. Indiana

Mccrary vs Indiana

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Jun-27-1960
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/99833

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
364 U.S. 277
Subject
MRTP

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

MRTP

Key legal issue
MRTP

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Mccrary

Respondent

Indiana

Excerpt

mccrary v. indiana - 364 u.s. 277 (1960) u.s. supreme court mccrary v. indiana, 364 u.s. 277 (1960) mccrary v. indiana no. 417, misc. decided june 27, 1960 364 u.s. 277 on petition for writ of certiorari to the supreme court of indiana syllabus petitioner alleges he was denied equal protection because as a pauper he was unable to furnish and pay for transcript of trial required by court rules to be filed with appeal in post-conviction proceeding in state court, and also that he was denied services of public defender. held: certiorari granted; order of dismissal vacated; and case remanded for further consideration. 239 ind. 707, 158 n.e.2d 292, vacated and remanded. per curiam. the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the writ of certiorari are granted. petitioner's attempted appeal to the supreme court of indiana from a denial of relief in a post-conviction coram nobis proceeding was dismissed because of his failure to comply with rules of that court, requiring, inter alia, the filing of a transcript of the trial proceedings. he alleges that the dismissal denied him the equal protection of the laws because he was and is unable to pay for the preparation of such a transcript, see griffin v. illinois, 351 u. s. 12 , and that, although he attempted to avail himself of the services of the indiana public defender, who is empowered to secure the preparation of such a transcript in paupers' cases, see burns' indiana stats. (1956 repl.), § 13-1401 et seq., that officer declined to assist him. the record before us does not disclose whether these allegations were made to, and passed on by, the indiana supreme court in light of griffin v. illinois, supra. accordingly we vacate the order of dismissal and remand the case to it for further consideration of the appeal.

Full Judgment

McCrary v. Indiana - 364 U.S. 277 (1960)
U.S. Supreme Court McCrary v. Indiana, 364 U.S. 277 (1960)

McCrary v. Indiana

No. 417, Misc.

Decided June 27, 1960

364 U.S. 277

ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

TO THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIANA

SYLLABUS

Petitioner alleges he was denied equal protection because as a pauper he was unable to furnish and pay for transcript of trial required by court rules to be filed with appeal in post-conviction proceeding in state court, and also that he was denied services of public defender.

Held: certiorari granted; order of dismissal vacated; and case remanded for further consideration.

239 Ind. 707, 158 N.E.2d 292, vacated and remanded.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the writ of certiorari are granted. Petitioner's attempted appeal to the Supreme Court of Indiana from a denial of relief in a post-conviction coram nobis proceeding was dismissed because of his failure to comply with rules of that court, requiring, inter alia, the filing of a transcript of the trial proceedings. He alleges that the dismissal denied him the equal protection of the laws because he was and is unable to pay for the preparation of such a transcript, see Griffin v. Illinois, 351 U. S. 12 , and that, although he attempted to avail himself of the services of the Indiana Public Defender, who is empowered to secure the preparation of such a transcript in paupers' cases, see Burns' Indiana Stats. (1956 Repl.), § 13-1401 et seq., that officer declined to assist him. The record before us does not disclose whether these allegations were made to, and passed on by, the Indiana Supreme Court in light of Griffin v. Illinois, supra. Accordingly we vacate the order of dismissal and remand the case to it for further consideration of the appeal.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial