West Vs. California

West vs California

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Oct-10-1960

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/99814

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/99814
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: Oct-10-1960
Case Number: 364 U.S. 287
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

West

Respondent

California

Excerpt

west v. california - 364 u.s. 287 (1960) u.s. supreme court west v. california, 364 u.s. 287 (1960) 364 u.s. 287 west v. california. appeal from the appellate department of the superior court of california, county of los angeles. no. 117. decided october 10, 1960. appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. henry t. moore, sr. and henry t. moore, jr. for appellant. william b. mckesson and ralph f. bagley for appellee. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. kahan v. california, 364 u.s. 287 (1960) 364 u.s. 287 (1960) "> u.s. supreme court kahan v. california, 364 u.s. 287 (1960) 364 u.s. 287 kahan et al. v. california. appeal from the appellate department of the superior court of california, county of los angeles. no. 130. decided october 10, 1960. appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. a. j. blackman for appellants. roger arnebergh and philip e. grey for appellee. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. page 364 u.s. 287, 288

Full Judgment

WEST v. CALIFORNIA - 364 U.S. 287 (1960)
U.S. Supreme Court WEST v. CALIFORNIA, 364 U.S. 287 (1960) 364 U.S. 287

WEST v. CALIFORNIA.
APPEAL FROM THE APPELLATE DEPARTMENT OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF
CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. No. 117.
Decided October 10, 1960.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Henry T. Moore, Sr. and Henry T. Moore, Jr. for appellant.

William B. McKesson and Ralph F. Bagley for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

KAHAN v. CALIFORNIA, <a href="/99814"> 364 U.S. 287 </a> (1960) 364 U.S. 287 (1960) "> U.S. Supreme Court KAHAN v. CALIFORNIA, 364 U.S. 287 (1960) 364 U.S. 287

KAHAN ET AL. v. CALIFORNIA.
APPEAL FROM THE APPELLATE DEPARTMENT OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA,
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. No. 130.
Decided October 10, 1960.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

A. J. Blackman for appellants.

Roger Arnebergh and Philip E. Grey for appellee.