Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Cooper Vs. Pitchess

Cooper vs Pitchess

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Oct-17-1960
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/99810

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
364 U.S. 294
Subject
FERA

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

FERA

Key legal issue
FERA

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Cooper

Respondent

Pitchess

Excerpt

cooper v. pitchess - 364 u.s. 294 (1960) u.s. supreme court cooper v. pitchess, 364 u.s. 294 (1960) 364 u.s. 294 cooper et al. v. pitchess, sheriff, los angeles county, et al. appeal from the supreme court of california. no. 278. decided october 17, 1960. appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. reported below: 53 cal. 2d 772, 349 p.2d 956. stanley fleishman and sam rosenwein for appellants. harold w. kennedy, william lamoreaux, william b. mckesson, ralph f. bagley and victor h. blanch for appellees. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. the chief justice and mr. justice black are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted. page 364 u.s. 294, 295

Full Judgment

COOPER v. PITCHESS - 364 U.S. 294 (1960)
U.S. Supreme Court COOPER v. PITCHESS, 364 U.S. 294 (1960) 364 U.S. 294

COOPER ET AL. v. PITCHESS, SHERIFF, LOS ANGELES COUNTY, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.
No. 278.
Decided October 17, 1960.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 53 Cal. 2d 772, 349 P.2d 956.

Stanley Fleishman and Sam Rosenwein for appellants.

Harold W. Kennedy, William Lamoreaux, William B. McKesson, Ralph F. Bagley and Victor H. Blanch for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE and MR. JUSTICE BLACK are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Page 364 U.S. 294, 295



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial