King Vs. Ellis

King vs Ellis

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Nov-21-1960

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/99791

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/99791
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: Nov-21-1960
Case Number: 364 U.S. 445
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

King

Respondent

Ellis

Excerpt

king v. ellis - 364 u.s. 445 (1960) u.s. supreme court king v. ellis, 364 u.s. 445 (1960) 364 u.s. 445 king v. ellis, corrections director. on petition for writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the fifth circuit. no. 4, misc. decided november 21, 1960. certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded. petitioner pro se. will wilson, attorney general of texas, and leon f. pesek and linward shivers, assistant attorneys general, for respondent. per curiam. the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the district court for a full hearing. ellis v. united states, 356 u.s. 674 . statham v. california, 364 u.s. 445 (1960) 364 u.s. 445 (1960) "> u.s. supreme court statham v. california, 364 u.s. 445 (1960) 364 u.s. 445 statham v. california. appeal from the district court of appeal of california, second appellate district. no. 239, misc. decided november 21, 1960. appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. reported below: 176 cal. app. 2d 806, 1 cal. rptr. 767. carl q. christol for petitioner. per curiam. the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. page 364 u.s. 445, 446

Full Judgment

KING v. ELLIS - 364 U.S. 445 (1960)
U.S. Supreme Court KING v. ELLIS, 364 U.S. 445 (1960) 364 U.S. 445

KING v. ELLIS, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 4, Misc.
Decided November 21, 1960.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Petitioner pro se.

Will Wilson, Attorney General of Texas, and Leon F. Pesek and Linward Shivers, Assistant Attorneys General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court for a full hearing. Ellis v. United States, 356 U.S. 674 .

STATHAM v. CALIFORNIA, <a href="/99791"> 364 U.S. 445 </a> (1960) 364 U.S. 445 (1960) "> U.S. Supreme Court STATHAM v. CALIFORNIA, 364 U.S. 445 (1960) 364 U.S. 445

STATHAM v. CALIFORNIA.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE
DISTRICT. No. 239, Misc.
Decided November 21, 1960.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 176 Cal. App. 2d 806, 1 Cal. Rptr. 767.

Carl Q. Christol for petitioner.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 364 U.S. 445, 446

Same Parties King vs Ellis Same Subject Land Acquisition