Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Thomas Vs. Virginia

Thomas vs Virginia

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Nov-21-1960
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/99789

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
364 U.S. 443
Subject
Customs

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Customs

Key legal issue
Customs

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Thomas

Respondent

Virginia

Excerpt

thomas v. virginia - 364 u.s. 443 (1960) u.s. supreme court thomas v. virginia, 364 u.s. 443 (1960) 364 u.s. 443 thomas v. virginia. certiorari to the circuit court of arlington county, virginia. no. 43. argued november 10, 1960. decided november 21, 1960. judgment reversed and cause remanded. cornelius h. doherty argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. r. d. mcilwaine iii, assistant attorney general of virginia, argued the cause for respondent. with him on the briefs were a. s. harrison, jr., attorney general, and john w. knowles, assistant attorney general. per curiam. the judgment of the circuit court of arlington county of the commonwealth of virginia is reversed and the case is remanded to that court. blodgett v. silberman, 277 u.s. 1, 18 . mr. justice black dissents for the same reason expressed by mr. justice holmes in union transit co. v. kentucky, 199 u.s. 194, 211 : "it seems to me that the result reached by the court probably is a desirable one, but i hardly understand how it can be deduced from the fourteenth amendment . . . . " page 364 u.s. 443, 444

Full Judgment

THOMAS v. VIRGINIA - 364 U.S. 443 (1960)
U.S. Supreme Court THOMAS v. VIRGINIA, 364 U.S. 443 (1960) 364 U.S. 443

THOMAS v. VIRGINIA.
CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA.
No. 43.
Argued November 10, 1960.
Decided November 21, 1960.

Judgment reversed and cause remanded.

Cornelius H. Doherty argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner.

R. D. McIlwaine III, Assistant Attorney General of Virginia, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the briefs were A. S. Harrison, Jr., Attorney General, and John W. Knowles, Assistant Attorney General.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Circuit Court of Arlington County of the Commonwealth of Virginia is reversed and the case is remanded to that court. Blodgett v. Silberman, 277 U.S. 1, 18 .

MR. JUSTICE BLACK dissents for the same reason expressed by Mr. Justice Holmes in Union Transit Co. v. Kentucky, 199 U.S. 194, 211 :

    "It seems to me that the result reached by the Court probably is a desirable one, but I hardly understand how it can be deduced from the Fourteenth Amendment . . . . "

Page 364 U.S. 443, 444



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial