Advanced Search Results
Apar Private Ltd. and Others Vs. Union of India and Others
Mumbai
Oct-17-1985
Customs
Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 2, 2(23), 2(25), 2(27), 2(28), 5, 11, 12, 12(1), 13, 14, 14(1), 14(2), 15, 15(1), 17, 20, 21, 22, 23, 25, 25(1), 25(2), 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 37, 38, 42, 45, 46, 46(1), 48, 49, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 66(1), 68, 69, 77, 79, 80, 110(1), 111 and 150; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 10; Customs Tariff Act, 1975
1986(1)BomCR196; (1986)88BOMLR355; 1985(6)ECC241; 1988(19)LC514(Bombay); 1985(22)ELT644(Bom)
Madhava Reddy, C.J.1. Four questions arising under the Customs Act, 1962 (52 of 1962) are referred to the Full
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskLaxman Padma Bhagal and ors. Vs. the State
Mumbai
Dec-22-1964
CriminalCustoms
Land Customs Act, 1924 - Sections 3, 3(1); Sea Customs Act, 1878 - Sections 6 and 171-A; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3, 30, 24, 25, 114 and 133; Central Excises Act, 1944 - Sections 21; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 191; Constitution of India - Article 20(3)
AIR1965Bom195; (1965)67BOMLR317; 1965CriLJ616; ILR1965Bom648; 1965MhLJ705
office and latter also asked Rajaram to ring up the customs people, as well as his superior officer, one Police superintendent
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNarang Hotels and Resorts Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.
Mumbai
Oct-09-2003
Sales TaxCustoms
Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Sections 5 and 5(1); Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959; Constitution of India - Article 286 and 286(1); Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 2(12), 2(13) and 7; Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Sections 23(1) and 23(2)
[2004]135STC289(Bom)
title of the goods : after the goods crossed the customs frontiers of India, as such the sales effected by them
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTurn these results into brief-ready notes
Barium Chemicals Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Andhra Pradesh
Dec-04-1987
Customs
Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 7, 8, 11, 12, 12(1), 14, 15, 25, 25(1), 33, 46, 47 and 50; Customs Tariff Act, 1975 - Sections 2, 2(1), 3, 3(1), 3(2) and 3(6); Central Excise Act, 1944; Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973; Customs Valuation Rules, 1963 - Rule 8; Central Excise Rules - Rule 8
1988(17)ECC201; 1988(37)ELT327(AP)
the Secretary, Ministry of Finance and the Assistant Collector of Customs, Kandla Port, Gujarat State are the two respondents. Pursuant to
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJaIn Shudh Vanaspati Limited Vs. Union of India and anr.
Delhi
May-11-1983
Customs
Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 15
1983(14)ELT1688(Del); ILR1983Delhi327
Resin is classified under Chapter 39 of 1st Schedule to Customs Tariff Act. 1975 and falls under headingNo. 39.01 '0.6 and
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPrem Cables Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Assistant Collector (Principal Appraiser) Cu ...
Rajasthan
Sep-06-1978
ExciseCustoms
Indian Tariff Act, 1936 - Sections 2, 2A, 2A(1) and 2A(2); Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 2, 12(1), 25, 25(1), 27, 27(1), 128 and 131; Finance Act, 1965 - Sections 26(1), 76(1) and 77; Constitution of India (Fifteenth Amendment) Act, 1963 - Sections 8; Sea Customs Act - Sections 23; Finance Act, 1964 - Sections 57(1); Central Excise Act, 1944; Finance Act, 1960; Indian Tariff Act, 1934; Central Excise (Conversion to Metric Units) Act, 1968; Finance Act, 1969; Evidence Act - Sections 106; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 17(1); Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Articles 24, 62 and 96; Constitution of India - Articles 19, 32, 136, 226 and 226(1A); Contract Act - Sections 72; Orissa Sales Tax Act - Sections 4, 14 and 19; Uttar Pradesh Sales Tax Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sectio
1981(8)ELT440(Raj); 1978(11)WLN481
purity and 3' diameter. These goods were cleared from the Customs at Bombay and at the time of clearance, the Assistant
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM.S. Shawhney, Asstt. Collector of Customs and anr. Vs. Sylvania and L ...
Mumbai
Jan-14-1975
Customs
Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 2(27), 12, 15, 25, 25(1), 46, 68 and 129; Constitution of India - Article 226; Indian Tariff Act, 1934; Indian Tariff Act, 1932; The Sea Customs Act (1878) - Sections 20(2)
1988(19)LC192(Bombay); 1987(30)ELT126(Bom)
Kantawala, C.J.1. The Asstt. Collector of Customs and the Union of India have filed this appeal against
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM.A. Rangaswami and ors. Vs. AmIn Chand Payarelal Firm, Bombay
Mumbai
Mar-09-1978
Customs
Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 2, 2(25), 2(33), 11, 11(1), 111, 112 and 125; Imports (Control) Order, 1955; Imports and Exports (Control) Act, 1947 - Sections 3, 3(1), 3(2), 3(3), 4A and 5; Indian Partnership Act; Sea Customs Act, 1878 - Sections 19, 167 and 167(8); Imports and Exports (Control) Amendment Ordinance, 1975; Imports and Exports (Control) (Amendment) Act, 1976
AIR1979Bom130; (1978)80BOMLR250
the conclusion on facts reached by either the Collector of Customs or the Member of the Central Board of Excise and
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Secretary of State Vs. Mask and Co.
Mumbai
Mar-15-1940
Customs
(1940)42BOMLR767
first of which consisted of 1,000 bags imported through the Customs station at Pondicherry on December 31, 1932. The remaining bags
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM.G. Abrol and anr. Vs. Amichand Vallamji and ors.
Mumbai
Sep-07-1960
Customs
Sea Customs Act, 1878 - Sections 167(8), 178, 178A, 178A(1) and 180; Bombay Sales Tax Act; Foreign Exchange Regulations Act - Sections 23A; Constitution of India - Article 226
AIR1961Bom227; (1960)62BOMLR1043; ILR1961Bom318
This is an appeal filed by the Additional Collector of Customs, Bombay, and the Union of India, against the order passed
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTry AI Brief & Semantic Search — 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »