Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Beck Vs. Binks

Beck vs Binks

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Dec-05-1960
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/99781

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
364 U.S. 475
Subject
Miscellaneous

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Miscellaneous

Key legal issue
Miscellaneous

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Beck

Respondent

Binks

Excerpt

beck v. binks - 364 u.s. 475 (1960) u.s. supreme court beck v. binks, 364 u.s. 475 (1960) 364 u.s. 475 beck et al. v. binks, director of department of registration and education of illinois. appeal from the supreme court of illinois. no. 461. decided december 5, 1960. appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. reported below: 19 ill. 2d 72, 165 n. e. 2d 292. edwin s. d. butterfield for appellants. william l. guild, attorney general of illinois, and william c. wines and raymond s. sarnow, assistant attorneys general, for appellee. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for certiorari, certiorari is denied. kotrich v. county of du page, 364 u.s. 475 (1960) 364 u.s. 475 (1960) "> u.s. supreme court kotrich v. county of du page, 364 u.s. 475 (1960) 364 u.s. 475 kotrich et al. v. county of du page, illinois, et al. appeal from the supreme court of illinois. no. 473. decided december 5, 1960. appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. reported below: 19 ill. 2d 181, 166 n. e. 2d 601. arthur frankel, nathan glick and lawrence e. glick for appellants. per curiam. the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. page 364 u.s. 475, 476

Full Judgment

BECK v. BINKS - 364 U.S. 475 (1960)
U.S. Supreme Court BECK v. BINKS, 364 U.S. 475 (1960) 364 U.S. 475

BECK ET AL. v. BINKS, DIRECTOR OF DEPARTMENT OF REGISTRATION AND
EDUCATION OF ILLINOIS.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS. No. 461.
Decided December 5, 1960.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 19 Ill. 2d 72, 165 N. E. 2d 292.

Edwin S. D. Butterfield for appellants.

William L. Guild, Attorney General of Illinois, and William C. Wines and Raymond S. Sarnow, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for certiorari, certiorari is denied.


KOTRICH v. COUNTY OF Du PAGE, <a href="/99781"> 364 U.S. 475 </a> (1960) 364 U.S. 475 (1960) "> U.S. Supreme Court KOTRICH v. COUNTY OF Du PAGE, 364 U.S. 475 (1960) 364 U.S. 475

KOTRICH ET AL. v. COUNTY OF Du PAGE, ILLINOIS, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS.
No. 473.
Decided December 5, 1960.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 19 Ill. 2d 181, 166 N. E. 2d 601.

Arthur Frankel, Nathan Glick and Lawrence E. Glick for appellants.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 364 U.S. 475, 476



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial