Skip to content
How to use Download this judgment as PDF
  1. Log in with a plan that includes downloads.
  2. Click Download on the judgment page.
  3. Save the PDF to your device for offline reading or filing.

Riser Vs. Warden

Riser vs Warden

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Feb-24-1959
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/99739
Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
358 U.S. 646

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Riser

Respondent

Warden

AI Legal Summary

Get an instant AI-powered legal breakdown - case summary, ratio decidendi, key issues, and more.

How to use Get a quick AI summary
  1. Open any judgment page.
  2. Click the AI Summary tab or button.
  3. Review facts, issues, and holding - verify against the full text before citing.

Excerpt

riser v. warden - 358 u.s. 646 (1959) u.s. supreme court riser v. warden, 358 u.s. 646 (1959) 358 u.s. 646 riser v. warden, california state prison. appeal from the supreme court of california. no. 331, misc. decided february 24, 1959. appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. reported below: see 47 cal. 2d 566. george t. davis for appellant. stanley mosk, attorney general of california, clarence a. linn, chief assistant attorney general, and arlo e. smith, deputy attorney general, for appellee. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. johnson v. ohio, 358 u.s. 646 (1959) 358 u.s. 646 (1959) "> u.s. supreme court johnson v. ohio, 358 u.s. 646 (1959) 358 u.s. 646 johnson v. ohio. appeal from the court of appeals of ohio, montgomery county. no. 428, misc. decided february 24, 1959. appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. appellant pro se. mathias h. heck for appellee. per curiam. the appeal is dismissed. treating the papers whereon the appeal

Full Judgment

RISER v. WARDEN - 358 U.S. 646 (1959)
U.S. Supreme Court RISER v. WARDEN, 358 U.S. 646 (1959) 358 U.S. 646

RISER v. WARDEN, CALIFORNIA STATE PRISON.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.
No. 331, Misc.
Decided February 24, 1959.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: See 47 Cal. 2d 566.

George T. Davis for appellant.

Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, Clarence A. Linn, Chief Assistant Attorney General, and Arlo E. Smith, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


JOHNSON v. OHIO, <a href="/99739"> 358 U.S. 646 </a> (1959) 358 U.S. 646 (1959) "> U.S. Supreme Court JOHNSON v. OHIO, 358 U.S. 646 (1959) 358 U.S. 646

JOHNSON v. OHIO.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, MONTGOMERY COUNTY.
No. 428, Misc.
Decided February 24, 1959.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Appellant pro se.

Mathias H. Heck for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 358 U.S. 646, 1




Save Judgments · Add Notes · Store Search Results · Organize Client Files Start your Free Trial