Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Smith Vs. United States

Smith vs United States

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Oct-12-1959
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/99599

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
361 U.S. 13
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Smith

Respondent

United States

Excerpt

smith v. united states - 361 u.s. 13 (1959) u.s. supreme court smith v. united states, 361 u.s. 13 (1959) 361 u.s. 13 smith v. united states. on petition for writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the ninth circuit. no. 33, misc. decided october 12, 1959. certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded. petitioner pro se. solicitor general rankin, assistant attorney general wilkey and beatrice rosenberg for the united states. per curiam. the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. the judgment is vacated and the case remanded to the court of appeals for reconsideration in light of johnson v. united states, 352 u.s. 565 ; farley v. united states, 354 u.s. 521 ; and ellis v. united states, 356 u.s. 674 . spivak v. california, 361 u.s. 13 (1959) 361 u.s. 13 (1959) "> u.s. supreme court spivak v. california, 361 u.s. 13 (1959) 361 u.s. 13 spivak v. california. appeal from the supreme court of california. no. 59, misc. decided october 12, 1959. appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. per curiam. the appeal is dismissed. treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. page 361 u.s. 13, 14

Full Judgment

SMITH v. UNITED STATES - 361 U.S. 13 (1959)
U.S. Supreme Court SMITH v. UNITED STATES, 361 U.S. 13 (1959) 361 U.S. 13

SMITH v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 33, Misc.
Decided October 12, 1959.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Petitioner pro se.

Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Wilkey and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case remanded to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of Johnson v. United States, 352 U.S. 565 ; Farley v. United States, 354 U.S. 521 ; and Ellis v. United States, 356 U.S. 674 .


SPIVAK v. CALIFORNIA, <a href="/99599"> 361 U.S. 13 </a> (1959) 361 U.S. 13 (1959) "> U.S. Supreme Court SPIVAK v. CALIFORNIA, 361 U.S. 13 (1959) 361 U.S. 13

SPIVAK v. CALIFORNIA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.
No. 59, Misc.
Decided October 12, 1959.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 361 U.S. 13, 14



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial