Beard Vs. Ohio

Beard vs Ohio

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Oct-12-1959

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/99590

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/99590
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: Oct-12-1959
Case Number: 361 U.S. 4
Subject: Contract

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Contract

Key legal issue: Contract

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Beard

Respondent

Ohio

Excerpt

beard v. ohio - 361 u.s. 4 (1959) u.s. supreme court beard v. ohio, 361 u.s. 4 (1959) 361 u.s. 4 beard v. ohio. on petition for writ of certiorari to the supreme court of ohio. no. 2, misc. decided october 12, 1959. certiorari granted and judgment reversed. petitioner pro se. mark mcelroy, attorney general of ohio, and william m. vance, assistant attorney general, for respondent. per curiam. the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. the judgment is reversed. burns v. ohio, 360 u.s. 252 . mr. justice stewart took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. page 361 u.s. 4, 5

Full Judgment

BEARD v. OHIO - 361 U.S. 4 (1959)
U.S. Supreme Court BEARD v. OHIO, 361 U.S. 4 (1959) 361 U.S. 4

BEARD v. OHIO.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.
No. 2, Misc.
Decided October 12, 1959.

Certiorari granted and judgment reversed.

Petitioner pro se.

Mark McElroy, Attorney General of Ohio, and William M. Vance, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is reversed. Burns v. Ohio, 360 U.S. 252 .

MR. JUSTICE STEWART took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 361 U.S. 4, 5

Same Parties Beard vs Ohio Same Subject Contract