Advanced Search Results

Raj Rani Vs. Prem Adib

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Contract

Reported in : AIR1949Bom215; (1949)51BOMLR256

Desai, J.1. This suit raises a question of importance so far as contracts of service entered into on behalf of minors are concerned. Contracts involving service by minors may be of

Deep Chandra Vs. Ruknuddaula Shamsher Jang Nawab Mohammad Sajjad Ali K ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : ContractProperty

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 91 and 92; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 2; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 55(2)

Reported in : AIR1951All93

decree of the Civil Judge of Muzaffarnagar at Meerut, dismissing a suit for the specific performance of a contract for the sale of land alleged to have been concluded on 7-2-1942. The learned Judges were agreed on

A.S. Motors Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Contract

Reported in : I(2008)BC546

the Constitution, challenging communications made vide Annexure P/l dated 25.1.2007 by respondent Nos. 2 to 5 cancelling a contract granted for collection of user fee in National Highway No. 3, imposing of penalty of Rs. 2,41,097/- and

The Union of India Vs. Kishorilal Gupta and Bros.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ContractArbitration

Acts : Contract Act - Sections 62 and 63; Law of Contract

Reported in : AIR1959SC1362; [1960]1SCR493; MANU/SC/0180/1959

SUBBA RAO J.-This appeal by special leave raises the question of survival of an arbitration clause in a contract after the said contract is superseded by a fresh one. The respondent'-firm, styled as " Kishorilal Gupta &

P. Velumani Vs. K.A. Noorjahan Son of M.M. Ahmed HussaIn and

Court : Chennai

Subject : ContractProperty

Acts : Evidence Act - Sections 91; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 16, 20 and 20(2); Limitation Act - Sections 5 - Schedule: Article 54; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 51, 52, 62, 54, 58 and 63; Court Fees Act; General Clauses Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 7, Rule 11 - Sections 100, 115, 148, 149 and 151; Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : (2009)8MLJ161

was never intended or perceived nor it could ever be intended that the time was the essence of contract.4. It was further agreed that the second respondent/second plaintiff who initially performed his contract of sale as per

Abdul Kasem Ali Ahmed Vs. State of Assam and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : ConstitutionContract

a direction from the High Court for payment of amounts due and payable by the State Government in contractual matters and if so, in what circumstances, such a remedy can be made available ?2. In the present

Ka Ron Lanong Vs. the State of Assam

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Contract

Acts : Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 10, 31, 32, 56 and 213; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 7, Rule 7

He observed further that although the licences of the distillers were liable to be forfeited for breach of contract, but as in the case in question the breach was due to scarcity of rice, which was not

Tractor and Farm Equipment Ltd. Vs. Secretary to the Govt. of Assam, D ...

Court : Guwahati

Subject : ContractConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14, 226 and 253; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 1, Rule 10; International Development Association (Status, Immunities and Privilages) Act, 1960 - Sections 3

leading to this appeal may be summarized as follows :(i) The present dispute relates to the award of contract for supply of 449 tractors to the Agriculture Department, Government of Assam, to be procured by the Government

Badru Nisha @ Madhuri Devi Vs. Yogendra Prasad Sinha

Court : Patna

Subject : PropertyContract

Acts : Indian Contract Act - Sections 55; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 100

100 of 1977 / 17 of 1981 decreeing the suit of the plaintiff for specific performance of the contract.2. The brief facts of the case are that the plaintiff-appellant has brought a suit for specific performance of

Prabir Kumar Das and ors. Vs. Amulya Bhushan Paul

Court : Guwahati

Subject : ContractProperty

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 2002; Tripura Land Revenue and Land Reforms Act, 1960; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 3, 6, 14, 40 and 54; Specific Relief Act, 1877 - Sections 23, 23(6) and 27; Specific Relief (Amendment) Act, 1963 - Sections 15 and 16; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 100A; Indian Law

agreement, which he had entered into with Haripada. When the plaintiff No. 1 came to learn about the contract for sale of the said building between the defendant Nos. 5 and 6, on the one hand, and