Tri-city Broadcasting Co. Vs. Bowers

Tri-city Broadcasting Co. vs Bowers

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Nov-16-1959

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/99570

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/99570
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: Nov-16-1959
Case Number: 361 U.S. 97
Subject: Other Taxes

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Other Taxes

Key legal issue: Other Taxes

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Tri-city Broadcasting Co.

Respondent

Bowers

Excerpt

tri-city broadcasting co. v. bowers - 361 u.s. 97 (1959) u.s. supreme court tri-city broadcasting co. v. bowers, 361 u.s. 97 (1959) 361 u.s. 97 tri-city broadcasting co. v. bowers, tax commissioner of ohio. appeal from the supreme court of ohio. no. 406. decided november 16, 1959. appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. reported below: 169 ohio st. 126, 158 n. e. 2d 203. carlton s. dargusch, carlton s. dargusch, jr. and jack h. bertsch for appellant. mark mcelroy, attorney general of ohio, and joseph d. karam, assistant attorney general, for appellee. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. page 361 u.s. 97, 98

Full Judgment

TRI-CITY BROADCASTING CO. v. BOWERS - 361 U.S. 97 (1959)
U.S. Supreme Court TRI-CITY BROADCASTING CO. v. BOWERS, 361 U.S. 97 (1959) 361 U.S. 97

TRI-CITY BROADCASTING CO. v. BOWERS, TAX COMMISSIONER OF OHIO.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.
No. 406.
Decided November 16, 1959.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 169 Ohio St. 126, 158 N. E. 2d 203.

Carlton S. Dargusch, Carlton S. Dargusch, Jr. and Jack H. Bertsch for appellant.

Mark McElroy, Attorney General of Ohio, and Joseph D. Karam, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 361 U.S. 97, 98

Same Parties Tri-city Broadcasting Co. vs Bowers Same Subject Other Taxes