Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Barnes Vs. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.

Barnes vs Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Mar-03-1958
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/99511

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
355 U.S. 608
Subject
Miscellaneous

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Miscellaneous

Key legal issue
Miscellaneous

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Barnes

Respondent

Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.

Excerpt

barnes v. columbia broadcasting system, inc. - 355 u.s. 608 (1958) u.s. supreme court barnes v. columbia broadcasting system, inc., 355 u.s. 608 (1958) 355 u.s. 608 barnes v. columbia broadcasting system, inc. appeal from the united states district court for the northern district of illinois. no. 226, misc. decided march 3, 1958. appeal dismissed. appellant pro se. louis m. mantynband and le roy r. krein for appellee. per curiam. the appeal is dismissed. gostovich v. valore, 355 u.s. 608 (1958) 355 u.s. 608 (1958) "> u.s. supreme court gostovich v. valore, 355 u.s. 608 (1958) 355 u.s. 608 gostovich v. valore, adjudication officer, veterans administration. appeal from the united states district court for the western district of pennsylvania. no. 247, misc. decided march 3, 1958. appeal dismissed. reported below: 153 f. supp. 826. louis c. glasso for appellant. solicitor general rankin, assistant attorney general doub and samuel d. slade for appellee. per curiam. the appeal is dismissed. page 355 u.s. 608, 1

Full Judgment

BARNES v. COLUMBIA BROADCASTING SYSTEM, INC. - 355 U.S. 608 (1958)
U.S. Supreme Court BARNES v. COLUMBIA BROADCASTING SYSTEM, INC., 355 U.S. 608 (1958) 355 U.S. 608

BARNES v. COLUMBIA BROADCASTING SYSTEM, INC.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
ILLINOIS. No. 226, Misc.
Decided March 3, 1958.

Appeal dismissed.

Appellant pro se.

Louis M. Mantynband and Le Roy R. Krein for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed.


GOSTOVICH v. VALORE, <a href="/99511"> 355 U.S. 608 </a> (1958) 355 U.S. 608 (1958) "> U.S. Supreme Court GOSTOVICH v. VALORE, 355 U.S. 608 (1958) 355 U.S. 608

GOSTOVICH v. VALORE, ADJUDICATION OFFICER, VETERANS ADMINISTRATION.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF
PENNSYLVANIA. No. 247, Misc.
Decided March 3, 1958.

Appeal dismissed.

Reported below: 153 F. Supp. 826.

Louis C. Glasso for appellant.

Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Doub and Samuel D. Slade for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed.

Page 355 U.S. 608, 1



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial