Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Aaron Vs. Cooper

Aaron vs Cooper

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Jun-30-1958
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/99377

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
357 U.S. 566
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Aaron

Respondent

Cooper

Excerpt

.....and it denied a stay of its suspension order pending appeal. after an appeal to the court of appeals had been docketed and application for a stay had been made to that court, petitioners applied to this court for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the district court before the court of appeals had had an opportunity to act on the petition for a stay or to hear the appeal. held: the writ is denied on the assumption that the court of appeals will act upon the application for a stay or the appeal in ample time to permit arrangements to be made for the next school year. pp. 357 u. s. 566 -567. per curiam. on june 21, 1958, the district court for the eastern district of arkansas entered an order authorizing the members of the school board of little rock, arkansas, and the superintendent of schools, to suspend until january, 1961, a plan of integration theretofore approved by that court in august, 1956, aaron v. cooper, 143 f.supp. 855, and affirmed by the court of appeals for the eighth circuit in april, 1957. 243 f.2d 361. on june 23, 1958, the district court denied an application for a stay of execution of its order. an appeal was docketed in the page 357 u. s. 567 court of appeals for the eighth circuit on june 24, 1958, and there is pending in that court an application for a stay of the district court's order. by the present petition, this court is asked to bring the case here before the court of appeals has had an opportunity to act upon the petition for a stay or to hear the appeal. the power of the court to do so has been exercised but rarely, and the issues and circumstances relevant to the present petition do not warrant its exercise now. the order that the district court suspended has, in different postures, been before the court of appeals for the eighth circuit three times already. aaron v. cooper, 243 f.2d 361; thomason v. cooper, 254 f.2d 808 (april 28, 1958); faubus v. united states, .....

Full Judgment

Aaron v. Cooper - 357 U.S. 566 (1958)
U.S. Supreme Court Aaron v. Cooper, 357 U.S. 566 (1958)

Aaron v. Cooper

No. 1095

Decided June 30, 1958

357 U.S. 566

ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

SYLLABUS

A Federal District Court entered an order authorizing public school officials of Little Rock, Ark., to suspend until January, 1961, a plan of racial integration previously approved by that Court and affirmed by the Court of Appeals, and it denied a stay of its suspension order pending appeal. After an appeal to the Court of Appeals had been docketed and application for a stay had been made to that Court, petitioners applied to this Court for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the District Court before the Court of Appeals had had an opportunity to act on the petition for a stay or to hear the appeal.

Held: the writ is denied on the assumption that the Court of Appeals will act upon the application for a stay or the appeal in ample time to permit arrangements to be made for the next school year. Pp. 357 U. S. 566 -567.

PER CURIAM.

On June 21, 1958, the District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas entered an order authorizing the members of the School Board of Little Rock, Arkansas, and the Superintendent of Schools, to suspend until January, 1961, a plan of integration theretofore approved by that court in August, 1956, Aaron v. Cooper, 143 F.Supp. 855, and affirmed by the Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit in April, 1957. 243 F.2d 361. On June 23, 1958, the District Court denied an application for a stay of execution of its order. An appeal was docketed in the

Page 357 U. S. 567

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit on June 24, 1958, and there is pending in that court an application for a stay of the District Court's order.

By the present petition, this Court is asked to bring the case here before the Court of Appeals has had an opportunity to act upon the petition for a stay or to hear the appeal. The power of the Court to do so has been exercised but rarely, and the issues and circumstances relevant to the present petition do not warrant its exercise now. The order that the District Court suspended has, in different postures, been before the Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit three times already. Aaron v. Cooper, 243 F.2d 361; Thomason v. Cooper, 254 F.2d 808 (April 28, 1958); Faubus v. United States, 254 F.2d 797 (April 28, 1958). That court is the regular court for reviewing orders of the District Court here concerned, and the appeal and the petition for a stay are matters properly to be adjudicated by it in the first instance.

We have no doubt that the Court of Appeals will recognize the vital importance of the time element in this litigation, and that it will act upon the application for a stay or the appeal in ample time to permit arrangements to be made for the next school year.

Accordingly, the petition for certiorari is

Denied.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial