Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Grochowiak Vs. Pennsylvania

Grochowiak vs Pennsylvania

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Oct-13-1958
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/99359

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
358 U.S. 47
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Grochowiak

Respondent

Pennsylvania

Excerpt

grochowiak v. pennsylvania - 358 u.s. 47 (1958) u.s. supreme court grochowiak v. pennsylvania, 358 u.s. 47 (1958) 358 u.s. 47 grochowiak v. pennsylvania. appeal from the superior court of pennsylvania, philadelphia district. no. 166. decided october 13, 1958. appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. reported below: 184 pa. super. 522, 136 a. 2d 145. john w. keller and mitchell salem fisher for appellant. thomas d. mcbride, attorney general of pennsylvania, frank p. lawley, jr. and harry j. rubin, deputy attorneys general, and george c. eppinger for appellee. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. mr. justice douglas is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted. maranze v. montgomery county board of elections, 358 u.s. 47 (1958) 358 u.s. 47 (1958) "> u.s. supreme court maranze v. montgomery county board of elections, 358 u.s. 47 (1958) 358 u.s. 47 maranze v. montgomery county board of elections et al. appeal from the supreme court of ohio. no. 144, misc. decided october 13, 1958. appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. reported below: 167 ohio st. 323, 148 n. e. 2d 229. per curiam. the appeal is dismissed. treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. page 358 u.s. 47, 48

Full Judgment

GROCHOWIAK v. PENNSYLVANIA - 358 U.S. 47 (1958)
U.S. Supreme Court GROCHOWIAK v. PENNSYLVANIA, 358 U.S. 47 (1958) 358 U.S. 47

GROCHOWIAK v. PENNSYLVANIA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA, PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT.
No. 166.
Decided October 13, 1958.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 184 Pa. Super. 522, 136 A. 2d 145.

John W. Keller and Mitchell Salem Fisher for appellant.

Thomas D. McBride, Attorney General of Pennsylvania, Frank P. Lawley, Jr. and Harry J. Rubin, Deputy Attorneys General, and George C. Eppinger for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.


MARANZE v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, <a href="/99359"> 358 U.S. 47 </a> (1958) 358 U.S. 47 (1958) "> U.S. Supreme Court MARANZE v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, 358 U.S. 47 (1958) 358 U.S. 47

MARANZE v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.
No. 144, Misc.
Decided October 13, 1958.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 167 Ohio St. 323, 148 N. E. 2d 229.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 358 U.S. 47, 48



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial