Uphaus Vs. Wyman

Uphaus vs Wyman

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Oct-14-1957

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/99198

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/99198
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: Oct-14-1957
Case Number: 355 U.S. 16
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Uphaus

Respondent

Wyman

Excerpt

uphaus v. wyman - 355 u.s. 16 (1957) u.s. supreme court uphaus v. wyman, 355 u.s. 16 (1957) 355 u.s. 16 uphaus v. wyman, attorney general of new hampshire. appeal from the supreme court of new hampshire. no. 332. decided october 14, 1957. judgment vacated and cause remanded for consideration in the light of sweezy v. new hampshire, 354 u.s. 234 . reported below: 100 n. h. 436, 130 a. 2d 278. royal w. france and leonard b. boudin for appellant. per curiam. the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the supreme court of new hampshire for consideration in light of sweezy v. new hampshire, 354 u.s. 234 . lewis v. florida, 355 u.s. 16 (1957) 355 u.s. 16 (1957) "> u.s. supreme court lewis v. florida, 355 u.s. 16 (1957) 355 u.s. 16 lewis v. florida. appeal from the supreme court of florida. no. 80, misc. decided october 14, 1957. appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. reported below: 93 so.2d 46. h. m. rosenhouse for appellant. richard w. ervin, attorney general of florida, and david u. tumin, assistant attorney general, for appellee. per curiam. the appeal is dismissed. treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. page 355 u.s. 16, 17

Full Judgment

UPHAUS v. WYMAN - 355 U.S. 16 (1957)
U.S. Supreme Court UPHAUS v. WYMAN, 355 U.S. 16 (1957) 355 U.S. 16

UPHAUS v. WYMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW HAMPSHIRE.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE.
No. 332.
Decided October 14, 1957.

Judgment vacated and cause remanded for consideration in the light of Sweezy v. New Hampshire, 354 U.S. 234 .

Reported below: 100 N. H. 436, 130 A. 2d 278.

Royal W. France and Leonard B. Boudin for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of New Hampshire for consideration in light of Sweezy v. New Hampshire, 354 U.S. 234 .

LEWIS v. FLORIDA, <a href="/99198"> 355 U.S. 16 </a> (1957) 355 U.S. 16 (1957) "> U.S. Supreme Court LEWIS v. FLORIDA, 355 U.S. 16 (1957) 355 U.S. 16

LEWIS v. FLORIDA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA.
No. 80, Misc.
Decided October 14, 1957.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 93 So.2d 46.

H. M. Rosenhouse for appellant.

Richard W. Ervin, Attorney General of Florida, and David U. Tumin, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 355 U.S. 16, 17

Same Parties Uphaus vs Wyman Same Subject Land Acquisition