Skip to content


Uphaus Vs. Wyman - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation

Court

US Supreme Court

Decided On

Case Number

355 U.S. 16

Appellant

Uphaus

Respondent

Wyman

Excerpt:


uphaus v. wyman - 355 u.s. 16 (1957) u.s. supreme court uphaus v. wyman, 355 u.s. 16 (1957) 355 u.s. 16 uphaus v. wyman, attorney general of new hampshire. appeal from the supreme court of new hampshire. no. 332. decided october 14, 1957. judgment vacated and cause remanded for consideration in the light of sweezy v. new hampshire, 354 u.s. 234 . reported below: 100 n. h. 436, 130 a. 2d 278. royal w. france and leonard b. boudin for appellant. per curiam. the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the supreme court of new hampshire for consideration in light of sweezy v. new hampshire, 354 u.s. 234 . lewis v. florida, 355 u.s. 16 (1957) 355 u.s. 16 (1957) "> u.s. supreme court lewis v. florida, 355 u.s. 16 (1957) 355 u.s. 16 lewis v. florida. appeal from the supreme court of florida. no. 80, misc. decided october 14, 1957. appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. reported below: 93 so.2d 46. h. m. rosenhouse for appellant. richard w. ervin, attorney general of florida, and david u. tumin, assistant attorney general, for appell

Judgment:


UPHAUS v. WYMAN - 355 U.S. 16 (1957)
U.S. Supreme Court UPHAUS v. WYMAN, 355 U.S. 16 (1957) 355 U.S. 16

UPHAUS v. WYMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW HAMPSHIRE.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE.
No. 332.
Decided October 14, 1957.

Judgment vacated and cause remanded for consideration in the light of Sweezy v. New Hampshire, 354 U.S. 234 .

Reported below: 100 N. H. 436, 130 A. 2d 278.

Royal W. France and Leonard B. Boudin for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of New Hampshire for consideration in light of Sweezy v. New Hampshire, 354 U.S. 234 .


LEWIS v. FLORIDA, <a href="/99198"> 355 U.S. 16 </a> (1957) 355 U.S. 16 (1957) "> U.S. Supreme Court LEWIS v. FLORIDA, 355 U.S. 16 (1957) 355 U.S. 16

LEWIS v. FLORIDA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA.
No. 80, Misc.
Decided October 14, 1957.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 93 So.2d 46.

H. M. Rosenhouse for appellant.

Richard W. Ervin, Attorney General of Florida, and David U. Tumin, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 355 U.S. 16, 17




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //