Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Albanese Vs. Pierce

Albanese vs Pierce

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Oct-14-1957
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/99197

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
355 U.S. 15
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Albanese

Respondent

Pierce

Excerpt

albanese v. pierce - 355 u.s. 15 (1957) u.s. supreme court albanese v. pierce, 355 u.s. 15 (1957) 355 u.s. 15 albanese v. pierce et al. appeal from the supreme court of errors of connecticut. no. 247. decided october 14, 1957. appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. reported below: 144 conn. 241, 129 a. 2d 606. charles a. horsky and j. warren upson for appellant. david goldstein for appellees. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. united states v. vorreiter, 355 u.s. 15 (1957) 355 u.s. 15 (1957) "> u.s. supreme court united states v. vorreiter, 355 u.s. 15 (1957) 355 u.s. 15 united states v. vorreiter. on petition for writ of certiorari to the supreme court of colorado. no. 168. decided october 14, 1957. certiorari granted and judgment reversed. united states v. security trust & savings bank, 340 u.s. 47 . 134 colo. 543, 307 p.2d 475, reversed. solicitor general rankin, assistant attorney general rice and a. f. prescott for the united states. per curiam. the petition for writ of certiorari is granted. the judgment of the supreme court of colorado is reversed. united states v. security trust & savings bank, 340 u.s. 47 . page 355 u.s. 15, 16

Full Judgment

ALBANESE v. PIERCE - 355 U.S. 15 (1957)
U.S. Supreme Court ALBANESE v. PIERCE, 355 U.S. 15 (1957) 355 U.S. 15

ALBANESE v. PIERCE ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ERRORS OF CONNECTICUT.
No. 247.
Decided October 14, 1957.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 144 Conn. 241, 129 A. 2d 606.

Charles A. Horsky and J. Warren Upson for appellant.

David Goldstein for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


UNITED STATES v. VORREITER, <a href="/99197"> 355 U.S. 15 </a> (1957) 355 U.S. 15 (1957) "> U.S. Supreme Court UNITED STATES v. VORREITER, 355 U.S. 15 (1957) 355 U.S. 15

UNITED STATES v. VORREITER.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO.
No. 168.
Decided October 14, 1957.

Certiorari granted and judgment reversed. United States v. Security Trust & Savings Bank, 340 U.S. 47 .

134 Colo. 543, 307 P.2d 475, reversed.

Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Rice and A. F. Prescott for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the Supreme Court of Colorado is reversed. United States v. Security Trust & Savings Bank, 340 U.S. 47 .

Page 355 U.S. 15, 16



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial