Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Four Maple Drive Realty Corp. Vs. Abrams

Four Maple Drive Realty Corp. vs Abrams

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Oct-14-1957
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/99196

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
355 U.S. 14
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Four Maple Drive Realty Corp.

Respondent

Abrams

Excerpt

four maple drive realty corp. v. abrams - 355 u.s. 14 (1957) u.s. supreme court four maple drive realty corp. v. abrams, 355 u.s. 14 (1957) 355 u.s. 14 four maple drive realty corp. v. abrams, new york state rent administrator, et al. appeal from the court of appeals of new york. no. 181. decided october 14, 1957. appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. reported below: 2 n. y. 2d 837, 140 n. e. 2d 870. edward margolin and herbert m. balin for appellant. nathan heller for the new york state rent administrator, appellee. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. watson v. united states, 355 u.s. 14 (1957) 355 u.s. 14 (1957) "> u.s. supreme court watson v. united states, 355 u.s. 14 (1957) 355 u.s. 14 watson v. united states. on petition for writ of certiorari to the court of claims. no. 161. decided october 14, 1957. certiorari granted; judgment vacated and case remanded for consideration in the light of service v. dulles, 354 u.s. 363 . reported below: 137 ct. cl. 557. rees b. gillespie for petitioner. solicitor general rankin for the united states. per curiam. the petition for writ of certiorari is granted. the judgment of the united states court of claims is vacated and the case is remanded for consideration in light of service v. dulles, 354 u.s. 363 . page 355 u.s. 14, 15

Full Judgment

FOUR MAPLE DRIVE REALTY CORP. v. ABRAMS - 355 U.S. 14 (1957)
U.S. Supreme Court FOUR MAPLE DRIVE REALTY CORP. v. ABRAMS, 355 U.S. 14 (1957) 355 U.S. 14

FOUR MAPLE DRIVE REALTY CORP. v. ABRAMS, NEW YORK STATE RENT
ADMINISTRATOR, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK. No. 181.
Decided October 14, 1957.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 2 N. Y. 2d 837, 140 N. E. 2d 870.

Edward Margolin and Herbert M. Balin for appellant.

Nathan Heller for the New York State Rent Administrator, appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


WATSON v. UNITED STATES, <a href="/99196"> 355 U.S. 14 </a> (1957) 355 U.S. 14 (1957) "> U.S. Supreme Court WATSON v. UNITED STATES, 355 U.S. 14 (1957) 355 U.S. 14

WATSON v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CLAIMS.
No. 161.
Decided October 14, 1957.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated and case remanded for consideration in the light of Service v. Dulles, 354 U.S. 363 .

Reported below: 137 Ct. Cl. 557.

Rees B. Gillespie for petitioner.

Solicitor General Rankin for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the United States Court of Claims is vacated and the case is remanded for consideration in light of Service v. Dulles, 354 U.S. 363 .

Page 355 U.S. 14, 15



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial